check_order
Retrieve the current status and details of a specific order by providing its order ID.
Instructions
Get the current status and details of a specific order.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | The order ID to check |
Retrieve the current status and details of a specific order by providing its order ID.
Get the current status and details of a specific order.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | The order ID to check |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description implies a read-only operation, but no annotations exist to confirm. It does not disclose error behavior (e.g., if order not found) or any additional behavioral traits. The description is somewhat transparent but lacks depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description is sufficient. It covers the tool's purpose and input, though it could mention return format or common errors.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the single parameter well. The description does not add further semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides, hitting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'status and details of a specific order.' It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'list_orders' (list all) and 'cancel_order' (mutate).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied but not explicit. There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'list_orders' or 'get_product,' nor are any prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/globallayer/merka2a-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server