create_list
Create a new shopping list by specifying a name for the list.
Instructions
Create a new shopping list.
Args: name: Name for the new list.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Create a new shopping list by specifying a name for the list.
Create a new shopping list.
Args: name: Name for the new list.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states the action (create) and parameter, but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, permissions, or whether the list is created immediately or requires confirmation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise with two lines, no wasted words. However, it could be slightly more structured (e.g., dividing into description and args sections more clearly).
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimally sufficient. It covers the main purpose and parameter, but lacks any information about return values or confirmation of success.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds a brief explanation for the 'name' parameter ('Name for the new list.'). This provides basic semantics beyond the schema, though it is minimal and does not elaborate on constraints or formatting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it creates a new shopping list and specifies the name parameter. It is distinguishable from sibling tools like add_item or delete_list, but could more explicitly differentiate from other list creation tools if any existed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, context, or when not to use it. Sibling tools exist but no recommendations are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/glitchcrab/buy-me-a-pie-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server