Delete Scaleway bucket website configuration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description clearly indicates a destructive/removal action ('Remove', 'stops serving'), while the annotations declare destructiveHint: false. This is a direct contradiction, making the description misleading about the tool's behavioral impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the core action and its consequence without any unnecessary words. It is highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and the description states the main effect, but the contradiction with destructiveHint creates confusion about whether data/configuration is permanently lost. It also does not mention behavior when the configuration does not exist or whether the operation is reversible, leaving important gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides complete parameter descriptions (bucket name and optional region with enum). The description adds no additional parameter semantics, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the action: 'Remove the static-website configuration' and the result: 'the website endpoint stops serving.' This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_bucket_website and put_bucket_website.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to disable static website hosting on a bucket, but it does not explicitly state when to use it vs. alternatives or mention any conditions. The sibling list provides context, but the description itself offers no direct guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.