Skip to main content
Glama
gkgaurav31

MCP Terminal Tool Server

by gkgaurav31
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Terminal Tool Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Shell Server

      IsaacCode0107
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides a terminal tool for executing shell commands with safety features like timeouts and error handling.
      -

    • Shell Server

      joandiazcapell
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that provides AI assistants with access to a system's terminal through a secure terminal tool. It enables users to execute shell commands and receive stdout, stderr, and exit codes directly within an MCP-compatible client.
      1
      -

    • MCP Terminal Server

      ivannafigueroa
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that allows running terminal commands with output capture, enabling command execution on the host system from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.
      1
      -

    • MCP Terminal

      sichang824
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server that enables AI assistants to execute terminal commands and retrieve outputs via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
      3
      27
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool has a single, clear purpose: running terminal commands and returning output.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'terminal_tool' follows a consistent noun_noun pattern, though with only one tool, consistency is inherently perfect. There are no deviations or mixed conventions to evaluate.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for a terminal server is too few for the apparent scope, as it lacks coverage for common terminal operations like listing files, navigating directories, or managing processes. This minimal set will likely cause agent failures due to missing functionality.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a terminal server. While 'terminal_tool' can run arbitrary commands, there are significant gaps: no dedicated tools for basic operations (e.g., ls, cd, pwd, ps) or structured outputs, forcing agents to rely on raw command parsing and increasing error risk.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources