A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables agents to discover, sample, and pay per call in USDC for live threat intelligence, ZK proof generation, and arbitrage signals via the x402 protocol.
MIT
datasieve-mcp
by gitwormq
Related Servers
Alternatives to datasieve-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
@hpp-io/x402-mcp-bridgeofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to autonomously pay for and discover services using HPP USDC.e over the x402 protocol, without API keys or manual signing.93 npmApache 2.0
@coinbase/payments-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceCombines wallets, onramps, and payments via x402 to enable AI agents to autonomously discover and pay for services without API keys or complex setup.85 npm58Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and pay for x402-enabled services using natural language, with multi-chain support for Solana and EVM payments.6 npm1MIT
Pylon MCP Serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides 20+ AI agent capabilities like web scraping, PDF parsing, OCR, and more, with pay-per-use micropayments via x402.1-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to pay per tool call in USDC via the x402 micropayment protocol, with no API keys or subscriptions required.-
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 19 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: watch lifecycle (create/pause/resume/renew/delete/status), coordination (barrier/arrive/lock/release/workspace), and payment/health (x402_ping/payment_status/service_health). Minor overlap exists between drain_events and coord_events (both collect events), and coord_release lacks a description, causing slight ambiguity with coord_lock's release.
Naming Consistency3/5
Naming is a mix of verb_noun (create_watch, pause_watch, delete_watch), noun_verb (watch_status, service_health), and prefixed coord_* tools. Each subdomain is internally consistent, but there is no single pattern across the entire set, making it predictable only within groups.
Tool Count4/5
19 tools is above the ideal 3-15 range but justified by the broad scope: watch management, coordination primitives, payment validation, and event verification. Each tool appears necessary, though a few (e.g., two with no descriptions) could be consolidated.
Completeness4/5
The watch lifecycle is fully covered (create, read via status, pause, resume, renew, delete), and event draining and receipt verification are included. Coordination barrier and lock patterns are complete. Minor gaps exist, such as no list_watches or ability to modify watch conditions, but core workflows are solid.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues