Skip to main content
Glama
gitkvn

stickafile-mcp

by gitkvn

Related Servers

Alternatives to stickafile-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to upload files and folders to a Pshare instance and generate share links, with support for optional password, TTL, and chunked uploads for large files.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely transfer files between machines via encrypted, expiring share links, with tools for upload, download, status checks, and link management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables moving artifacts from ChatGPT/Codex sandboxes to remote server storage via host-native file parameters, streaming large files without Base64 or model-context overhead.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to list, upload, download, and delete files on named static sites served by a private home lab, with token scopes controlling read-only or destructive access.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      File uploads for AI agents. Upload, list, and manage files from AI coding assistants like Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code Copilot with no signup required.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and users to upload and download files via MCP, generating shareable links and identifier codes. Files are automatically deleted after 24 hours.
      9
      -

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    push uploads a file and returns a link, while list_portals enumerates available portals; these are clearly distinct resource+action pairs with no overlap. The descriptions even clarify the dependency relationship between them without creating ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use lowercase snake_case, but 'push' is a bare verb while 'list_portals' follows the verb_noun convention. The deviation is minor and both remain readable and predictable in style.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin even for a focused file-sharing server; the primary action (push) plus one helper leaves no room for adjacent operations. It is defensible for a narrowly scoped uploader, but sits at the borderline of feeling under-provisioned.

    Completeness3/5

    The core upload-to-link workflow and portal discovery are covered, but there is no way to list files already in a portal, check upload status, delete/revoke a previously shared file, or manage portals beyond listing them. These are notable gaps for a file-sharing lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues