Skip to main content
Glama
githubscum

lotor-mcp

by githubscum
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to lotor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Proof Layer MCP

      World-999-Labs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic governance receipts for AI agents, enabling pre-execution evaluation and signed verdicts (EXECUTE/BLOCK/REVIEW/SHADOW) with offline-verifiable audit trails.
      MIT

    • wwall

      axdvdv
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to propose wallet payments while a local, human-authored policy decides whether each transaction is approved, requires human confirmation, or is refused, and records every decision in a signed, append-only ledger.
      -

    • Openterms-mcp

      jstibal
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Cryptographic proof of consent for AI agents. Sign before you act. Policy engine enforces spending caps, action whitelists, and escalation rules. Independently verifiable by anyone.
      10
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • @sequesign/mcp

      Sequesign
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create cryptographically verifiable receipts of their delegated work, with capabilities for multi-party approval and offline verification.
      11
      54 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no risk of confusion or overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'query_receipts' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and consistency is trivially maintained.

    Tool Count1/5

    A single tool is extremely limited for a server likely intended to manage receipts; at minimum, write and full retrieval operations are expected.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool surface provides only a query function with no create, update, delete, or full receipt retrieval, leaving critical gaps for any practical workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources