Skip to main content
Glama
gitayg

appcrane-mcp

by gitayg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to appcrane-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AppCrane

      gitayg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AppCrane is the self-hosted home for the apps your AI builds and your AI deploys. It exposes 35 appcrane_* MCP tools so any MCP client (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) can run the full deploy lifecycle — create app, deploy to sandbox/production, manage secrets, stream logs, list releases, roll back — every action bound to a user and audit-logged. Enterprise SSO (SAML/OIDC/SCIM), Docker isolation per a
      6
      AGPL 3.0

    • Relay

      adarshp14
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access a unified catalog of tools from various APIs (OpenAPI, GraphQL, MCP, Google Discovery) through the MCP protocol.
      MIT

    • executor

      UsefulSoftwareCo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An integration layer for AI agents that provides a catalog of tools from various sources (OpenAPI, GraphQL, MCP, etc.) and can be used as an MCP server for compatible agents.
      3,967
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with detailed descriptions that prevent confusion even among similar operations (e.g., cp vs push_staged_file, get_logs vs get_deploy_log).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent appcrane_verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_app, list_apps, set_secret, deploy). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 35 tools, the server is on the heavy side. While the scope is broad (full app lifecycle management), the number exceeds the typical 25+ threshold, making it feel slightly oversized. Some consolidation could be considered.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the entire app lifecycle: creation, deployment, configuration, access control, file operations, logs, health, analytics, and request management. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources