vrm_auth_logout
Log out of the VRM session to securely end your authenticated access.
Instructions
Logout from the current VRM session.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Log out of the VRM session to securely end your authenticated access.
Logout from the current VRM session.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It clearly states the core action (logout from current session), implying session termination. However, it does not detail side effects like token invalidation or re-login requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler, directly states purpose. Excellent conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description is nearly complete. It could mention that the session ends and authentication is cleared, but the current text is sufficient for an agent to understand basic function.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. According to the baseline rule for 0 params, score is 4. Description adds no param info but none needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Logout') and resource ('current VRM session'), clearly distinguishing it from the sibling vrm_auth_login_as_demo and other tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool (e.g., after login, before ending a session) or when not to use alternatives. No prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gimi-q/victron-vrm-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server