A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceProvides AI coding agents with deterministic, offline repository intelligence including AST symbol indexing, import/dependency graphs, and bounded context summaries via the Model Context Protocol.
MIT
CodeAtlas MCP Server
by giauphan
Related Servers
Alternatives to CodeAtlas MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides LLMs with code intelligence tools like relationship explanation, PR impact analysis, and health reports via the Model Context Protocol.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely browse, search, inspect, and understand local project files through Model Context Protocol tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurns a codebase into a queryable graph with semantic search, call graphs, and control/data flow analysis, served to AI coding agents via the Model Context Protocol.206 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that analyzes application codebases with real-time file watching, providing AI assistants like Claude with deep insights into project structure, code patterns, and architecture.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes code search and file reading tools over the Model Context Protocol, enabling any MCP-compatible client to query a codebase with natural language.-
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes. However, `generate_feature_flow_diagram` and `trace_feature_flow` both trace feature flow by keyword, differing only in output format (diagram vs. ordered list). Descriptions help differentiate, but an agent might still select the wrong one for a given need.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., `generate_feature_flow_diagram`, `get_dependencies`, `list_projects`). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
Tool Count5/5
With 10 tools, the set covers the domain of code analysis and documentation well. Each tool serves a distinct, necessary function without redundancy or bloat.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers core CRUD-like operations for projects and entities, plus advanced analysis (flows, insights, memory sync). Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for editing entities or comparing versions, but core workflows are supported.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues