Skip to main content
Glama
giaffa86

Spring Toolkit MCP

by giaffa86

Related Servers

Alternatives to Spring Toolkit MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP security server for AI coding agents. 12 tools: pre-install guardian, vulnerability audit, supply-chain attack detection via static code analysis, and CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation. Zero runtime dependencies.
      14
      24 npm
      16
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that gives AI agents safe access to your local dev environment: filesystem, databases, processes, and OpenAPI specs.
      15
      43 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that enables AI coding agents to read, edit, search, and run code in local projects with human review loops and policy controls.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 44 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, especially the Actuator endpoints each targeting a specific resource. However, there are aliases (e.g., spring_project_summary / analyze_project_structure, spring_generate_mockmvc_tests / generate_mockmvc_test) that create ambiguity, and the testing tools (run_maven_tests, run_gradle_tests, run_specific_test) could be confused despite different contexts.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, run_, inspect_). Some tools have a 'spring_' prefix while others do not, causing minor inconsistency. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable, with only a few deviations.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 44 tools, the number is high for typical agent usability. While each Actuator endpoint is distinct, the sheer count risks overwhelming agents. The scope is broad (project analysis, testing, and monitoring), but the tool set could be consolidated, e.g., by making Actuator endpoints configurable or merging some similar tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers project analysis, code review, test generation, test execution, and nearly all Actuator endpoints. Minor gaps include no tool for creating or building a Spring Boot project, and no coverage of Spring Boot's configuration management (like env properties are read-only). Overall, it's comprehensive for analysis and monitoring.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues