A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceBuilds SCORM 2004 compliant e-learning courses locally with automated packaging and data privacy.
1
MIT
scorm-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to scorm-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that compiles interactive, standards-conformant e-learning courses into SCORM packages. It lets you (or an AI client) describe a course as a structured spec and receive a self-contained SCORM zip ready for any LMS.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to generate and package SCORM 1.2 compliant interactive learning activities (matching and quiz) with a 16:9 responsive player shell, including scoring, timers, lives, and synthesized audio.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables generation of educational content like MCQs, lesson plans, and flashcards without relying on external LLMs, fully offline and compatible with Claude Desktop.4-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFree certification prep for the Claude Certified Architect exam. 390 scenario-based questions, guided capstone build, 30 concept handouts, 6 reference projects, practice exams, interactive UI with clickable answer cards, progress dashboard, spaced repetition, and deterministic grading. Everything runs locally — no cloud, no accounts, no telemetry.221833 npm34MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCompiles websites, docs, and repositories into agent-ready SKILL.md packages for AI coding agents.MIT
TDQS
A4.6/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The three tools map to clearly distinct roles: packaging source content into SCORM, validating an existing SCORM package, and running a server-side self-test. There is no meaningful overlap in inputs, purposes, or expected usage.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the scorm_ prefix and snake_case style, making them predictable. The slight deviation is that scorm_package and scorm_validate read as verb-first, while scorm_selftest reads as a noun, but the pattern is still easy to follow.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools is well-scoped for this server's purpose: one to create packages, one to validate packages, and one to diagnose the environment. Each tool earns its place and the count is appropriate for the domain.
Completeness5/5
The toolset covers the full relevant workflow: converting content to packages, validating existing packages against SCORM standards, and self-testing when issues arise. Input flexibility, batch mode, and detailed validation reporting address the main gaps a SCORM authoring server could face.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues