scorm-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to scorm-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceBuilds SCORM 2004 compliant e-learning courses locally with automated packaging and data privacy.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that compiles interactive, standards-conformant e-learning courses into SCORM packages. It lets you (or an AI client) describe a course as a structured spec and receive a self-contained SCORM zip ready for any LMS.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to generate and package SCORM 1.2 compliant interactive learning activities (matching and quiz) with a 16:9 responsive player shell, including scoring, timers, lives, and synthesized audio.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables generation of educational content like MCQs, lesson plans, and flashcards without relying on external LLMs, fully offline and compatible with Claude Desktop.4-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFree certification prep for the Claude Certified Architect exam. 390 scenario-based questions, guided capstone build, 30 concept handouts, 6 reference projects, practice exams, interactive UI with clickable answer cards, progress dashboard, spaced repetition, and deterministic grading. Everything runs locally — no cloud, no accounts, no telemetry.221832 npm38MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceIt enables autonomous browsing clients to canonically compress rendered HTML into compact semantic trees, filter navigation traps, bind webform schemas, transform tables into typed records, and score interaction trajectories. Its tools operate locally over stdio with no runtime third-party requirements.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools map to clearly distinct roles: packaging source content into SCORM, validating an existing SCORM package, and running a server-side self-test. There is no meaningful overlap in inputs, purposes, or expected usage.
All tools share the scorm_ prefix and snake_case style, making them predictable. The slight deviation is that scorm_package and scorm_validate read as verb-first, while scorm_selftest reads as a noun, but the pattern is still easy to follow.
Three tools is well-scoped for this server's purpose: one to create packages, one to validate packages, and one to diagnose the environment. Each tool earns its place and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The toolset covers the full relevant workflow: converting content to packages, validating existing packages against SCORM standards, and self-testing when issues arise. Input flexibility, batch mode, and detailed validation reporting address the main gaps a SCORM authoring server could face.