Ghost Security MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Ghost Security MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive access to DefectDojo vulnerability management platform.78MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that facilitates integration with OpenCTI, allowing users to query and retrieve cyber threat intelligence data via a standardized interface.1640MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server designed for testing backend APIs for security vulnerabilities like authentication bypass, injection attacks, and data leakage.1416MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Socket integration, allowing AI assistants to efficiently check dependency vulnerability scores and security information.1926 npm135MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for security research automation, integrating multiple security testing tools into LLM-driven workflows for secret scanning, static analysis, and vulnerability discovery.55Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for automated security vulnerability assessment, combining OWASP Dependency-Check dependency scanning with custom code vulnerability detection, and generating detailed HTML and JSON reports.-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: counting, retrieving specific findings, filtering findings, retrieving repositories, retrieving a specific repository, repository-scoped findings, and updating findings. No overlapping purposes exist.
All tools follow a consistent 'ghostsecurity_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., ghostsecurity_get_findings, ghostsecurity_update_finding). The naming is predictable and uniform.
7 tools is well-scoped for a security findings server, covering essential read and limited write operations without being excessive or insufficient.
The tool surface covers core functionality (CRUD for findings, read for repositories) but lacks operations like creating or deleting findings, which may be intentional given typical security workflows.