A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceProvides MCP tools for AI agents to classify changes into autonomous or human review lanes, and to run shadow simulations over backlogs without shipping anything.
MIT
squad-mcp
by ggemba
Related Servers
Alternatives to squad-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAI code reviews and git activity digests with machine-readable risk scoring, available as an MCP server for use within an agent session.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for persistent code exploration and diff-aware review, exposing explore and review tools to map call paths, blast radius, and generate explainable risk-scored reports.22 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for GitHub code search, Jira sprint status, pull request risk analysis, and project metrics, enabling agentic workflows for developer productivity.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables orchestrating a reusable team of expert agents (PM, architecture, development, QA, security) to analyze a project's files and produce consolidated recommendations. It exposes tools to list experts, ask a single expert, or run the full team from MCP clients.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AI DevTool workflow, exposing tools and resources for code review, repository chat, and repository operations.1-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 27 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools are mostly distinct with detailed descriptions, but some orchestration tools like compose_squad_workflow and compose_advisory_bundle could be confused by an agent as they both aggregate pipelines. Overall, the purpose of each tool is well-defined.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., detect_changed_files, record_learning), with no mixing of conventions. Naming is predictable and intuitive.
Tool Count3/5
With 27 tools, the server is on the heavy side but justifiable given the complex domain of squad-based code review and workflow management. A smaller set could cover core functionality, but the current count reflects comprehensive coverage.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers nearly all aspects of the squad workflow: config, file detection, agent selection, task management, learning, run tracking, and advisory composition. Minor gaps like external notifications are acceptable given the scope.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive