Skip to main content
Glama
gfam-git

Simple IMAP MCP Server

by gfam-git

Related Servers

Alternatives to Simple IMAP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, manage, schedule, and analyze email across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts through the Model Context Protocol, with provider-aware labels, real-time monitoring, and verification-code handling.
      18 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading, searching, sending, replying, forwarding emails, and managing labels in Gmail through the Model Context Protocol.
      61 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading and drafting emails via IMAP, including searching and managing drafts, through natural language.
      3,240 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize Proton Mail email via SMTP and IMAP through the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, reply to, forward, draft, schedule, manage, and analyze email across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts through the Model Context Protocol. Includes provider-aware label management, real-time IMAP IDLE watching with AI-powered triage, verification-code capture, calendar (ICS) extraction, desktop/webhook alerts, and OAuth2 support for Gmail and Microsoft 365.
      18 npm
      ISC

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation—full fetch, body-only, headers-only, flags, folder ops, drafts—but send_email and send_email_with_attachment, plus the three retrieval variants, have close functional boundaries that require careful description reading.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most names follow snake_case verb_noun, but verbs are inconsistent (fetch vs get vs list), list_unread omits the object, and email_waiting reverses the expected verb-object order.

    Tool Count4/5

    Sixteen tools is on the high end but each maps to a real email workflow—retrieve, search, send, draft, folder management—so the count is only slightly above the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers retrieval, search, read state, move/delete, folder listing/creation, sending with and without attachments, and draft CRUD. Missing folder deletion/rename and attachment-only retrieval are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues