Skip to main content
Glama
geunu97

Teams Guide MCP

by geunu97
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Teams Guide MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • readyorai

      TedoNeObichaJavaScript
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local code inspection and analysis for clean code practices, best practices, and actionable recommendations without external API calls or modifying the code.
      22 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Code Review Workflow MCP

      Carl-jcc
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables automated code review by reading code files, checking for style issues like console.log and TODOs, and generating formatted reports.
      -

    • Smart Code Reviewer

      renjismzy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive code analysis including quality assessment, security vulnerability detection, refactoring suggestions, complexity calculations, and automatic documentation generation for multiple programming languages.
      5
      7 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have distinct primary purposes: check_clean_code analyzes code quality, get_guide retrieves guide content, and read_file reads external project files. However, there is some potential overlap between get_guide and read_file, as both involve reading content, but their specific targets (guide vs. general files) help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_clean_code, get_guide, read_file), with all using snake_case. The naming is clear and predictable, though 'check' and 'read' are slightly different verb styles, but this minor deviation does not hinder usability.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Teams Guide' purpose, as it might lack operations like updating guides or managing team-specific settings. However, the tools cover basic reading and analysis functions, making it borderline but not severely inadequate.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a 'Teams Guide' domain. It only supports reading and checking code against guides, with no tools for creating, updating, or deleting guides, managing teams, or handling user interactions, which are typical in such systems.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources