unbookmark_tweet

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a write operation ('remove') which aligns with the readOnlyHint=false annotation. It adds basic context but does not disclose potential side effects, rate limits, or authentication requirements, though the annotations already signal mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the essential action without fluff. Every word is meaningful and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is nearly sufficient. It misses noting that the tweet must be currently bookmarked, but overall it provides adequate context for a minimal viable description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description does not add meaning to the 'tweet_id' parameter beyond its name. It fails to specify the format (e.g., numeric string) or any constraints, leaving the agent to guess.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove a tweet from your bookmarks') with a specific verb and resource, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like 'bookmark_tweet' and 'search_bookmarks'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for unbookmarking a tweet but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_tweet) or mention prerequisites like authentication.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.