Skip to main content
Glama
getsimba-ai

Simba MCP Server

Official
by getsimba-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to Simba MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to marketing mix models, enabling natural language data upload, performance modeling, budget optimization, and scenario testing.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a controlled interface for Bayesian Marketing Mix Modeling, letting AI agents validate datasets, fit and diagnose MMMs, analyze channel contributions and ROI, simulate and optimize budgets, calibrate with lift tests, and cross-validate models—all with statistical verification, uncertainty reporting, and full provenance.
      33
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables marketing optimization tasks such as copywriting, campaign analysis, social media planning, audience segmentation, and KPI tracking through natural language.
      40 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query campaign performance, metrics, audiences, and geography, and to analyze budgets, wasted spend, and account health through natural language.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects Google Ads, Meta Ads, and LinkedIn Ads to AI assistants, enabling natural language ad campaign management, reporting, and optimization across platforms.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create, analyze, and optimize ad campaigns across Google Ads, Meta Ads, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Amazon Ads, and ChatGPT Ads through natural language using 400+ tools.
      105
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 94 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes and descriptions are unusually detailed, but several families overlap subtly: create_incrementality_test vs save_incrementality_test_design vs import_incrementality_tests vs design_incrementality_test, recipe/study authoring tools, and get_model_results vs the show_* chart wrappers. With 94 tools, an agent can still misselect within these clusters even though descriptions help.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g. create_model, get_model_results, list_study_runs, run_optimizer), with only minor stylistic variants like show_* and diff_*. No camelCase or chaotic mixing is present.

    Tool Count1/5

    94 tools is far beyond a well-scoped set; even for a complex MMM platform this imposes a very large selection surface and constant risk of wrong-tool choice. The rubric treats 50+ tools as an extreme mismatch.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: data upload/pipelines, model creation, results, diagnostics, optimization, scenarios, studies/recipes/quality policies, campaign mapping, incrementality tests and designs, run history, projects and sharing. CRUD/lifecycle coverage is broad with very few obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive