Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
getremcp

ReMCP

by getremcp
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ReMCP

Related Servers

  • porchlight

    mahali00
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables remote MCP clients to access local MCP servers and command-line tools over the web, with user approval required for every connection.
    1
    MIT
  • KMJ CodeBridge by kmjtechno

    KMJ CodeBridgeofficial

    kmjtechno
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to securely access authorized computers and VPSs for scoped file operations, Git operations, and administrator-defined quality gates through an outbound-polling gateway.
    2
    Apache 2.0

  • Portal

    s3hq4y
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to connect to a local workspace over a public tunnel and lets them run shell commands and transfer files bidirectionally.
    262 npm
    20
    GPL 3.0

  • HostGate MCP

    Taffy-1
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables an MCP client to safely access selected local files and trusted executables with policy control, audit, and rollback via a Windows control center.
    Apache 2.0
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool description explicitly routes away from its nearest neighbors (read_file vs manage_documents, view_image vs control_computer, run_terminal vs manage_system), which is unusually good. However, real overlaps remain: read_file admits it still does 'legacy .docx/.pdf extraction', manage_files has read/search operations, and control_computer's screen recording overlaps view_image's capture, so an agent can still misselect in those seams.

Naming Consistency4/5

All names are snake_case verb_noun and readable, but the verb set is mixed (manage_*, run_, control_, read_, view_), giving four different verb families across seven tools. The three manage_* siblings form a clean group while the remaining four each use a different verb, a minor inconsistency rather than a real problem.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a coherent capability domain (terminal, OS, GUI, documents, files, text, pixels). The multi-operation design is deliberate, with each tool exposing a closed operation schema rather than spawning dozens of narrow tools.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers shell, system/runtime, desktop GUI, office documents, filesystem, plain text, and pixels — essentially the full native-computer-control lifecycle, including writes, edits, and captures. Minor gaps remain: no explicit HTTP/web or network fetch capability, and image writing/encoding beyond capture is not evident.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources