Skip to main content
Glama
getnahook

nahook-mcp

Official
by getnahook
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to nahook-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • shipmail-mcp

      shipmail-to
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Official MCP server for Shipmail, enabling agents to manage domains, mailboxes, messages, threads, webhooks, and suppressions via natural language.
      100
      259 npm
      1
      MIT

    • inngest-cloud-mcp

      doctone
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Inngest Cloud REST API to inspect functions, runs, and events in production from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client.
      8
      17 npm
      1
      MIT
    • @racehooks/mcp by racehooks

      @racehooks/mcpofficial

      racehooks
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI assistants direct access to RaceHooks motorsport analytics and data, enabling management of webhooks, live sessions, simulations, and account usage.
      3 npm
      1
      MIT

    • easypanel-mcp-server

      helbertparanhos
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP Server for full Easypanel control via Claude Code, Cursor, and Claude Desktop. Provides 37 tools for deploy, logs, env vars, domains, databases, and monitoring with built-in safety guards.
      57
      16 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. There is no ambiguity between tools like create_endpoint vs update_endpoint, or list_deliveries vs list_attempts. send_to_endpoint and trigger_event are clearly differentiated by direct vs fan-out behavior.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools consistently use verb_noun naming in snake_case. The only outlier is 'whoami', which follows a common convention but deviates from the pattern. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools provide a well-scoped set for managing webhook endpoints, deliveries, and events. The count is neither too small nor too large, covering essential operations without being overwhelming.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is missing critical operations such as deleting an endpoint and managing subscriptions (which are implied by trigger_event). There is no way to list, add, or remove event subscriptions, which would be necessary for a complete webhook management system.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources