Skip to main content
Glama
getnable

nable (finops-mcp)

by getnable

Related Servers

Alternatives to nable (finops-mcp)

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to query AWS cloud costs, run waste and savings audits, and check budget status in natural language across multiple accounts, profiles, and regions. Runs locally using existing AWS CLI credentials, keeping them on the user's machine while connecting to MCP-compatible AI clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language analysis of AWS costs, automated FinOps waste audits, and budget monitoring across multiple profiles and regions while keeping credentials secure locally.
      184
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to query AWS cost and usage data, run waste and savings audits, and monitor budgets through natural-language prompts in MCP-compatible clients. It keeps AWS credentials local and supports multi-profile and multi-region analysis.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct: cost summary, cost preflight, AI budget check, and action policy check target separate decisions. However, the connection/onboarding story overlaps: connect_aws/gcp/azure, nable_setup_status, and list_connected_providers can all plausibly be selected when a user asks to connect or inspect providers. Descriptions help, but boundaries are not crisp enough for perfect tool selection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools use snake_case and several follow a verb_noun pattern (connect_aws, get_cost_summary, estimate_change_cost, list_connected_providers). But what_can_nable_do is phrased as a question and nable_setup_status uses a prefixed noun style, breaking a predictable convention. Readable overall, but not a clean uniform pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is a well-scoped set for a FinOps MCP server covering provider connection, cost visibility, budget/policy guardrails, and onboarding assistance. Each tool maps to a plausible agent workflow, and the count is neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are present: connect major clouds, summarize spend, preflight change cost, check AI budget, check action policy, and inspect setup/connected providers. But there are notable gaps for a FinOps server: no budget CRUD or budget listing, no disconnect/unlink operation, and no cost history/forecast/anomaly tooling. Agents can work around some gaps, but the lifecycle is not fully covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues