Skip to main content
Glama
getmasv

masv

Official
by getmasv
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to masv

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • YAFL MCP Server by yafldev

      YAFL MCP Serverofficial

      yafldev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely transfer files between machines via encrypted, expiring share links, with tools for upload, download, status checks, and link management.
      MIT

    • MinerU v4 MCP Server

      Sky6662025
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to convert PDFs and images into Markdown, JSON, HTML, LaTeX, DOCX, or ZIP by wrapping a document parsing service's REST API as callable tools, including uploads, parsing jobs, progress polling, and result downloads.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • usps-epf-mcp

      estermer
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an LLM to interact with the USPS EPF V2 REST Services API for listing files, requesting download manifests, streaming binary EPF files to disk, and updating file statuses.
      8
      MIT

    • invoiceninja-mcp-server

      NightSquawk
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes all 379 Invoice Ninja v5 REST API endpoints through three consolidated tools (list, describe, call), enabling full invoice management and business operations via natural language.
      3
      21 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resource+action pairs (portals, packages, integrations, activities). The activity trio (get_activities, get_activity_events, get_activities_information) has some overlap—get_activities vs get_activities_information could be confused—but descriptions differentiate them. Package variants (get_packages vs get_portal_packages vs get_package_files) are well explained.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern dominates (get_portal, create_portal, delete_package). Minor deviations: 'list_files_on_integration' uses list_ where siblings use get_, and 'update_package_expiration_date_and_time' is unusually verbose. Still readable and largely predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    20 tools is slightly heavy but well-scoped for a full file-transfer platform spanning portals, packages, integrations, activities, and team members. Each tool maps to a distinct operation, so no obvious filler.

    Completeness4/5

    Portals have full CRUD (get/get/create/update/delete) and packages cover retrieval, files, transfers, expiration, and deletion. Notable gap: no direct create_package for team packages (only integration-driven creation), and no delete for integrations—minor workarounds exist but the package-creation lifecycle is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources