Skip to main content
Glama
getmasv

masv

Official
by getmasv
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to masv

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • YAFL MCP Server by yafldev

      YAFL MCP Serverofficial

      yafldev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely transfer files between machines via encrypted, expiring share links, with tools for upload, download, status checks, and link management.
      MIT

    • usps-epf-mcp

      estermer
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an LLM to interact with the USPS EPF V2 REST Services API for listing files, requesting download manifests, streaming binary EPF files to disk, and updating file statuses.
      8
      MIT

    • invoiceninja-mcp-server

      NightSquawk
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes all 379 Invoice Ninja v5 REST API endpoints through three consolidated tools (list, describe, call), enabling full invoice management and business operations via natural language.
      3
      9 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are grouped by resource (portals, packages, activities, integrations, team) with clear actions. Minor overlap between get_activities and get_activities_information could cause confusion, but descriptions differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., create_portal, get_packages, transfer_files_from_integration). No mix of styles.

    Tool Count4/5

    20 tools for a file transfer service is slightly above average but covers multiple resource types (portals, packages, activities, integrations, team). Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is reasonable for the domain.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows for portals and transfers are covered, but there is no explicit create_package tool (packages are created implicitly via transfers or portals). Missing update package operations beyond expiration, and no tool to manage package files or downloads directly. Notable gaps reduce completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources