Skip to main content
Glama

get_icp_fit_score

Read-only

Evaluate companies against your ideal customer profile across 5 dimensions to identify sales-ready prospects. Uses your product details and buyer data for instant scoring without AI calls.

Instructions

Tells you in seconds whether the company you're thinking about is worth your time — scores them against who actually buys from you and why, across 5 dimensions. No AI calls, instant results.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
companyNameNoCompany name to evaluate
domainNoCompany website domain
industryNoIndustry vertical
employeeCountNoNumber of employees
revenueNoRevenue range (e.g., "$1M-$5M")
geographyNoHQ location
techStackNoTechnologies the company uses
painPointsNoKnown pain points or challenges they face
triggerEventsNoRecent trigger events (e.g., "just raised Series B", "new CTO hired")
productDescriptionNoA brief description of what the user's product does and who it's for. Infer this from the conversation if the user has already described their product. If the user hasn't mentioned their product yet, ask them: "What does your product do, and who do you sell to?" before calling this tool.
verticalNoThe industry the user sells into (e.g., "fintech", "healthcare", "defense"). Infer from conversation context — the user's product description, company name, or the companies they're asking about. If unclear, ask.
targetRoleNoThe buyer role being evaluated (e.g., "CFO", "CTO", "VP Sales"). Infer from context — often explicit in the user's question. If not mentioned, default to the most senior relevant role for their vertical.

Implementation Reference

  • src/catalog.js:41-72 (registration)
    Registration of the get_icp_fit_score tool in the static catalog.
    {
      name: 'get_icp_fit_score',
      description: 'Tells you in seconds whether the company you\'re thinking about is worth your time — scores them against who actually buys from you and why, across 5 dimensions. No AI calls, instant results.',
      annotations: READ_ONLY,
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          companyName: { type: 'string', description: 'Company name to evaluate' },
          domain: { type: 'string', description: 'Company website domain' },
          industry: { type: 'string', description: 'Industry vertical' },
          employeeCount: { type: 'number', description: 'Number of employees' },
          revenue: { type: 'string', description: 'Revenue range (e.g., "$1M-$5M")' },
          geography: { type: 'string', description: 'HQ location' },
          techStack: {
            type: 'array',
            items: { type: 'string' },
            description: 'Technologies the company uses',
          },
          painPoints: {
            type: 'array',
            items: { type: 'string' },
            description: 'Known pain points or challenges they face',
          },
          triggerEvents: {
            type: 'array',
            items: { type: 'string' },
            description: 'Recent trigger events (e.g., "just raised Series B", "new CTO hired")',
          },
          ...COLD_START_PARAMS,
        },
      },
    },
  • The MCP server handler for all tools, which proxies tool execution to the backend Andru API.
    server.setRequestHandler(
      CallToolRequestSchema,
      async (request) => {
        if (!client) {
          return {
            content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify({ error: 'ANDRU_API_KEY not configured. Tool execution requires an API key.' }) }],
            isError: true,
          };
        }
        const { name, arguments: args } = request.params;
        try {
          return await client.callTool(name, args || {});
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [{
              type: 'text',
              text: JSON.stringify({ error: error.message }),
            }],
            isError: true,
          };
        }
      }
    );
  • The client-side method that handles the actual API call for executing the tool.
     * Execute an MCP tool.
     * @param {string} name - Tool name
     * @param {object} args - Tool arguments
     * @returns {Promise<{ content: Array<{ type: string, text: string }>, isError?: boolean }>}
     */
    async callTool(name, args) {
      return this.post('/api/mcp/tools/call', { tool: name, arguments: args });
    }
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate read-only and open-world hints, which the description doesn't contradict. It adds valuable context beyond annotations: 'No AI calls, instant results' clarifies performance characteristics, and 'scores them against who actually buys from you and why' hints at data-driven matching. However, it doesn't detail rate limits, authentication needs, or output format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose in the first sentence, followed by clarifying details. Every sentence earns its place: the first defines the tool, the second adds scoring context and performance traits. No wasted words, making it efficient for an agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (12 parameters, no output schema) and rich annotations, the description is mostly complete. It covers purpose, behavior, and context but could better explain output expectations (e.g., score format) or parameter interdependencies. The absence of an output schema means the description should ideally hint at return values, which it partially does with 'scores them'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented in the schema. The description doesn't add meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining how parameters influence the score or which are most critical. It mentions '5 dimensions' but doesn't map them to parameters, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: scoring a company against buyer profiles across 5 dimensions to determine if it's worth pursuing. It specifies the verb ('scores'), resource ('company'), and scope ('against who actually buys from you'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'get_icp_profile' or 'classify_opportunity' by focusing on fit evaluation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use it ('whether the company you're thinking about is worth your time') and mentions 'No AI calls, instant results' as a behavioral trait, but it doesn't explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives like 'batch_fit_score' for multiple companies or 'get_disqualification_signals' for negative filtering.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/geter-andru/andru-revenue-intelligence'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server