Skip to main content
Glama
getAlby

OpenTimeStamps MCP Server

by getAlby

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenTimeStamps MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Document verification MCP server enabling AI agents to verify file authenticity by computing SHA-256 fingerprints locally and checking Bitcoin-anchored proofs via OpenTimestamps.
      5
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP hosts to anchor file hashes to Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps and verify proofs, ensuring files existed before a given time with privacy-preserving local hashing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides real-time Bitcoin blockchain and mempool data to AI clients, allowing access to comprehensive Bitcoin network information through various data tools.
      31
      4 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to interact with the Nostr network, allowing them to post notes and eventually send Lightning zaps to users.
      24 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step in the OpenTimestamps workflow (hash, stamp, load, info, upgrade, verify, retrieve). The only potential overlap is load_proof vs get_full_proof, but their descriptions distinguish inputs (hex/file vs hash), so confusion is limited.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case with a verb-first pattern (calculate_hash, stamp_hash, load_proof, upgrade_proof, verify_proof, etc.). The naming is predictable and consistent across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for the OpenTimestamps lifecycle; each operation serves a distinct purpose without redundancy. The count fits comfortably within the recommended 3–15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle operations—hashing, stamping, loading/retrieving proofs, inspecting, upgrading, and verifying—are all covered. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit save/export proof tool, though load_proof and get_full_proof may cover retrieval needs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues