LNbits MCP Serverofficial
A
licenseNot graded
qualityF
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Lightning wallets through LNbits, including balance checks, invoice creation, payments, and extension operations, all via natural language.
7
MIT
Lightning Tools MCP Server
by getAlby
Related Servers
Alternatives to Lightning Tools MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Bitcoin Lightning wallet integration with LLMs through Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC). Supports lightning payments, LNURL operations, and L402 authentication for AI-powered bitcoin transactions.18 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceConnects a Bitcoin Lightning wallet to your LLM using Nostr Wallet Connect, enabling payment functionalities within language models like Claude.69 npm15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to interact with the Lightning Network by providing an MCP-compliant API to pay invoices.24 npm6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform Bitcoin and Lightning Network payments using a non-custodial, zero-trust architecture. It provides 13 tools for wallet management, invoice creation, and payment processing while keeping node credentials local to the user's machine.139 npmMIT
Breez MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Lightning Network wallet operations through the Breez SDK, allowing users to check balances, send/receive payments, create invoices, and manage Bitcoin Lightning transactions via natural language.7MIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: fiat_to_sats handles currency conversion, parse_invoice processes existing invoices, and request_invoice generates new invoices from lightning addresses. An agent can easily distinguish these functions without confusion.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures (e.g., parse_invoice, request_invoice). The naming is uniform and predictable across the set.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a Lightning domain, as it lacks operations like sending payments, checking balances, or managing channels. However, the tools are well-scoped for basic invoice and conversion tasks, making it borderline but not severely lacking.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for Lightning functionality; it covers invoice parsing/requesting and fiat conversion but misses core operations like pay_invoice, get_balance, list_transactions, or channel management. This will likely cause agent failures in broader workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues