get_user
Retrieve detailed information about a specific user by providing their user ID.
Instructions
Get detailed information about a specific user
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | User ID |
Retrieve detailed information about a specific user by providing their user ID.
Get detailed information about a specific user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | User ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the operation itself. It does not mention permissions, rate limits, or what 'detailed' includes, leaving a gap in transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no redundant information. Every word serves a purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate but lacks details about return fields or what 'detailed' encompasses. More context would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, but the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'User ID'. The parameter is adequately documented but not enriched.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'user', and specifies 'detailed information', making it distinct from sibling tools like list_users or me. The purpose is specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use when a specific user ID is available, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_users or me. No exclusions or context are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gerbal/linear-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server