Scored across 30 tools
Each tool has a clear and distinct purpose, with detailed descriptions that differentiate them. Even closely related tools (e.g., reserve_files vs reserve_symbols) target different resource types, and operations like record, list, close are clearly separated. There is no ambiguity between tools.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., close_handoff_summary, get_active_reservations, record_changeset). The verbs describe precise actions, and nouns specify the target resource, making the naming predictable and intuitive.
With 30 tools, the server covers a broad domain including handoffs, reservations, changesets, code graph, workspace management, and activity logging. While the count is on the higher side, each tool serves a distinct operational need, and the number is justified by the scope of the protocol.
The tool set covers most lifecycle operations for the domain: CRUD for handoffs (create, list, close), reservations (create, release, renew, list), changesets (record, retrieve), and workspace configuration (get, set). Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit update handoff or delete workspace), but these are not critical for the intended agent coordination use case.