Skip to main content
Glama
geo-sapiens

Coletum MCP Server

Official
by geo-sapiens

Related Servers

Alternatives to Coletum MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect and extract invoice metadata from PDFs, Word documents, Excel files, and images, then synchronize and enrich the extracted data into an Excel ledger.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Give AI agents access to Formester form submissions. Read individual responses, search and filter across forms, write AI-generated insights back as custom fields, and process file attachments including PDFs and images.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to generate DOCX and PDF documents from DocMake templates through natural language, including template listing, field inspection, document rendering, DOCX import, and usage tracking.
      6
      33 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions (list forms, get structure, count/search/export submissions, manage templates). The two PDF generators (gerar_pdf_preenchimento vs gerar_pdf_modelo) share the same action (generate PDF) and could be confused, but descriptions clarify that one uses built-in Coletum models and the other uses custom Typst templates.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all names follow a clear verb_noun pattern in Portuguese (listar_formularios, buscar_preenchimentos, gerar_pdf_modelo, etc.). One outlier 'estrutura_formulario' is noun_noun, breaking the pattern slightly, but the set remains highly readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool earns its place: form listing, structure retrieval, submission counting/search/export, two PDF generation paths, model analysis/saving, and preference management. No redundant or trivial tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core workflows: listing forms, getting structure, counting/searching/exporting submissions, generating PDFs via built-in or custom templates, analyzing/saving templates, and managing preferences. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to fetch full submission details (including group items and attachment links) directly in-conversation, as that requires exporting to disk.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues