genxevo-selenium
Provides an MCP capability layer for Selenium UI automation engineering, enabling AI agents to discover project structure, analyze test failures, and eventually drive a real browser to verify fixes.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@genxevo-seleniumInvestigate why my checkout test is flaky and repair the locator."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
GenXEvo AI Automation Agent — Python Selenium
An MCP server that gives an AI coding agent reliable eyes and hands for Python + Selenium UI automation engineering — deterministic capabilities, structured evidence, enforced safety boundaries and verifiable results.
The problem
Ask any language model to fix a failing Selenium test and it will produce a confident, plausible, wrong XPath.
It has to. It cannot see the page, it cannot see the test output, and it usually cannot even see the project's real shape — which interpreter the suite runs on, which runner collects it, where the page objects actually live. It fills the gap with fluency.
GenXEvo exists to remove the gap, so the model has something true to reason about.
Related MCP server: UI Debugger MCP
The principle
Evidence before modification. Evidence before success.
The agent never invents a locator; it observes one. It never declares a fix; it proves one with a run correlated by identifier to the failure it claims to have repaired. Every capability returns evidence with an explicit trust level, every conclusion carries the signals that produced it, and every result says in a machine-readable field whether it succeeded — because an agent that cannot tell success from failure will confidently report a repair it never verified, and that outcome is worse than not helping at all.
What this is, and what it is not
Is | An MCP capability layer around the UI automation engineering workflow you already run |
Is not | A test framework, a Selenium wrapper, a replacement for pytest, or an AI of its own |
There is no model inside this server. The AI model reasons. GenXEvo is deterministic: it reads what is actually on disk, and later drives a real browser and executes real tests, and returns structured facts. When it does not know something, it says so, with a confidence level attached.
Status — honestly
This is phase 1A: the foundation and exactly two genuinely working capabilities.
Built and tested | Result contract, error vocabulary, evidence model, untrusted-content framing, configuration, path containment, secret redaction, test-selection validation, run model, capability catalogue, capability invoker, MCP adapter |
Working MCP tools |
|
Designed, catalogued, NOT callable | 15 further capabilities, each published with its delivery phase |
Not built | Browser control, test execution, repair, verification |
There are no stubs in this repository. A planned capability is visible in
genxevo_agent_status so an agent can plan around it, and is not registered as a tool, so an agent
can never call one. A fake implementation is worse than an honest absence, because it teaches the
agent something false.
See docs/roadmap.md for what each phase delivers and its exit criteria.
Quick start
Requirements
Python 3.11, 3.12 or 3.13
A Python automation project you want the agent to work on
The 3.11 floor is an engineering decision, not a fashion one:
tomllibentered the standard library in 3.11, and it is what lets project discovery parsepyproject.tomlwithout a third-party parser in the core. On 3.10 that would requiretomli. See ADR-001.
Install
python -m venv .venv
# Windows
.venv\Scripts\activate
# macOS / Linux
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e .Verify it starts — note that the banner goes to stderr, because stdout belongs to the MCP transport:
genxevo-selenium-agent --versionConnect it to an MCP client
Copy .mcp.json.example and point --workspace at your automation project:
{
"mcpServers": {
"genxevo-selenium": {
"command": "C:\\path\\to\\your\\.venv\\Scripts\\python.exe",
"args": [
"-m", "genxevo_selenium_agent",
"--workspace", "C:\\path\\to\\your\\automation-project"
]
}
}
}Naming the interpreter explicitly is the reliable form on every platform: a console script lives inside one virtual environment, and an MCP client does not inherit your activated shell.
Full instructions for Claude Code, VS Code and PyCharm: docs/installation.md.
Configure it (optional)
A missing configuration file is not an error — the defaults are the safe configuration. When you
want to change something, drop genxevo.config.toml in the workspace root:
version = 1
[execution]
enabled = false # test execution is off until you turn it on
require_selection = true # never run the whole suite by accident
[security]
redact_secrets = trueEvery setting, its default and its rationale: docs/configuration.md.
Architecture
AI MODEL (all reasoning lives here)
│ MCP · JSON-RPC over stdio
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ genxevo_selenium_agent.mcp_server THIN ADAPTER │
│ tool names · descriptions · annotations · stderr logging │
│ every tool function holds no logic │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ genxevo_selenium_agent.core THE PRODUCT │
│ standard library + one typing-only shim, and nothing else │
│ │
│ capabilities runtime · invoker · catalog · 2 built │
│ discovery manifests · runners · venvs · page objects │
│ security paths · redaction · selection · globs │
│ contracts ToolResult · AgentError · Evidence │
│ runs RunId · RunOutcome · FileRunRegistry │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
real project real browser (1C) real test runs (1D)Layer rule: behaviour never lives in the adapter. A tool function cannot be unit tested through an MCP client, so nothing that could be wrong is allowed in one.
The result contract
Every capability returns the same envelope, and an agent branches on status, never on prose:
{
"contractVersion": "1.0",
"status": "partialSuccess", // one of nine values — see below
"operation": "project.discover",
"summary": "…one sentence for a human…",
"data": { }, // shape documented per capability
"warnings": [ { "code": "…", "message": "…", "detail": "…" } ],
"error": null, // present whenever status is not succeeding
"evidence": [ { "id": "…", "kind": "…", "trust": "trusted|untrusted", … } ],
"nextActions": [ { "tool": "…", "reason": "…" } ],
"durationMs": 41,
"startedAt": "2026-08-22T09:15:00Z",
"safeToRetry": true
}The nine statuses: success · partialSuccess · failure · validationError ·
configurationError · blocked · timeout · cancelled · skipped
Each is a distinct decision an agent has to make. Nothing else is in the list.
Because the tools are annotated with a TypedDict, this whole contract — including the status
enum — is published in tools/list as each tool's outputSchema. An agent learns how to read a
result before it calls anything.
Invariants are enforced in code, not by convention: a succeeding status never carries an error, a
failing one always does, status is derived from the error's category so the two cannot
disagree, and a partialSuccess cannot be constructed without a warning explaining it.
Security posture
GenXEvo reads untrusted content, hands it to a language model, and will later give that model file-write and code-execution capabilities. The design assumption is that the model will eventually be persuaded to ask for something it should not have, and that the server, not the model, refuses.
Control | What it does |
Explicit workspace roots | Never inferred. Unconfigured means refuse, with the remedy |
Path containment | Reject structurally → canonicalise → then contain → deny list → intent. Capabilities take a |
Symlink resolution |
|
Deny list | Python-aware: |
Secret redaction | Key-name and value-shape detection, including Python source assignments like |
No project code is ever executed |
|
Untrusted framing | Escape-proof — a payload cannot forge either delimiter |
Selection validation | A selection starting with |
Safe defaults | Execution off, redaction on, selection required |
Bounded everything | Timeouts, cooperative cancellation, scan limits, repair-cycle ceiling |
Run correlation | Stale artefacts cannot be read as proof of a fix |
Error hygiene | No traceback ever reaches the agent; refusals never echo the absolute workspace path |
Residual risks are documented, not hidden — see SECURITY.md and
docs/security.md. Framing does not prevent influence, test execution is
arbitrary code by design, stdio MCP has no authentication, and redaction is heuristic.
The GenXEvo family
This is the second product in a family of independent agents. Each is separately cloneable and installable; what they share is a contract, not a build.
Selenium | Playwright | |
C# | planned | |
Python | this repository | planned |
Java · JavaScript · TypeScript | planned | planned |
What ports across languages is the JSON shape, the nine-status vocabulary, the error codes, the run identifier format, the evidence model and the safety classes. An agent that has learned one GenXEvo server should recognise the next one on first contact.
What is not shared is implementation. This product is Python-native by design: TypedDict
output schemas, tomllib configuration, dataclasses instead of a serialisation framework,
cooperative cancellation across asyncio.to_thread, and a discovery model built around
pyproject.toml, pyvenv.cfg and pytest's own collection rules.
Documentation
Document | Contents |
Packages, layers, domain model, contract, evidence, runs, concurrency | |
Claude Code, VS Code, PyCharm; the interpreter trap | |
Every setting, default and rationale; precedence; validation | |
Full contract — 2 implemented in detail, 15 planned with their guarantees | |
The engineering loop, rules for agents, a worked example, anti-patterns | |
Threat model, controls with rationale, residual risks | |
Architecture decision records, each tied to the defect that motivated it | |
Phases 1A–3 with exit criteria and what is out of scope | |
Concrete failure modes and their fixes | |
How to talk to the agent, with complete worked prompts | |
Working configuration files |
Development
pip install -e ".[dev]"
ruff check . # lint
ruff format --check . # format
mypy # strict type checking
pytest # the full suiteThe standard, written into CONTRIBUTING.md: every security control ships
with tests that assert the attack, not only the happy path, and genxevo_selenium_agent.core
imports the standard library and exactly one typing-only shim — enforced by a test that parses every
module with ast, not by convention. The one exception is typing_extensions, and
ADR-002 explains why the alternative is a server that will not start on Python
3.11.
Author
Rajeshkumar Muthu — Senior QA Automation Agentic AI Engineer.
Licensed under the MIT License.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to write and debug integration tests by providing live access to DOM structure and executing code directly in test environments.55410MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to autonomously debug UIs by delegating high-level stories to a small agent that drives browsers or desktop apps and reports structured pass/fail findings with evidence.1492MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control a browser with self-healing locators that automatically recover when selectors change, allowing reliable web automation through natural language.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to autonomously interact with and test web applications in a real browser, providing DOM/Accessibility tree extraction, runtime telemetry, screenshot capture, and Markdown test reports.1MIT
Related MCP Connectors
Browser-backed QA with evidence and fix-ready reports for coding agents.
Proves AI-generated Python does what you asked: lint, types, security, sandbox run, exact fixes.
AI QA tester — real browsers scan sites for bugs, SEO, perf, and accessibility issues via chat.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/genxevo/genxevo-ai-automation-agent-python-selenium'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server