get_metadata
Retrieve bibliographic metadata, including abstract, for a preprint by supplying its DOI.
Instructions
Retrieve bibliographic metadata (abstract only) for a preprint DOI.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doi | Yes |
Retrieve bibliographic metadata, including abstract, for a preprint by supplying its DOI.
Retrieve bibliographic metadata (abstract only) for a preprint DOI.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doi | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It notes 'abstract only' but omits read-only nature, error handling (e.g., invalid DOI), authentication needs, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundant words, front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks completeness: missing information on return format, error responses, or usage context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds that 'doi' is a 'preprint DOI', but with 0% schema coverage, more detail (e.g., format, examples) is expected to compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies a clear verb ('Retrieve') and resource ('bibliographic metadata (abstract only)') for a 'preprint DOI', distinguishing it from siblings like search_preprints (searching) and get_fulltext (full text).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention when not to use or connect to sibling tools like get_fulltext for full text.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/genecell/preprint-fulltext'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server