Skip to main content
Glama
gendosu

Notion MCP Server

by gendosu

API-get-user

Retrieve user details from Notion workspaces using a user ID, enabling AI agents to access and manage Notion data efficiently through the Notion API.

Instructions

Notion | Retrieve a user

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
user_idYes

Implementation Reference

  • Handler for executing any 'API-{operationId}' tool call: resolves operation from tool name, executes HTTP request to the API endpoint, and formats response as MCP content.
    this.server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
      const { name, arguments: params } = request.params
    
      // Find the operation in OpenAPI spec
      const operation = this.findOperation(name)
      if (!operation) {
        throw new Error(`Method ${name} not found`)
      }
    
      try {
        // Execute the operation
        const response = await this.httpClient.executeOperation(operation, params)
    
        // Convert response to MCP format
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text', // currently this is the only type that seems to be used by mcp server
              text: JSON.stringify(response.data), // TODO: pass through the http status code text?
            },
          ],
        }
      } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error in tool call', error)
        if (error instanceof HttpClientError) {
          console.error('HttpClientError encountered, returning structured error', error)
          const data = error.data?.response?.data ?? error.data ?? {}
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: 'text',
                text: JSON.stringify({
                  status: 'error', // TODO: get this from http status code?
                  ...(typeof data === 'object' ? data : { data: data }),
                }),
              },
            ],
          }
        }
        throw error
      }
    })
  • Registration of tool listing handler that constructs tool names as 'API-{method.name}' (e.g., 'API-get-user') from OpenAPI operations converted by the parser.
    this.server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => {
      const tools: Tool[] = []
    
      // Add methods as separate tools to match the MCP format
      Object.entries(this.tools).forEach(([toolName, def]) => {
        def.methods.forEach(method => {
          const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
          const truncatedToolName = this.truncateToolName(toolNameWithMethod);
          tools.push({
            name: truncatedToolName,
            description: method.description,
            inputSchema: method.inputSchema as Tool['inputSchema'],
          })
        })
      })
    
      return { tools }
    })
  • Schema generation and tool definition: creates 'API' tool group, generates input schemas for each OpenAPI operation, and keys lookup with 'API-{operationId}' (e.g., 'API-get-user').
    convertToMCPTools(): {
      tools: Record<string, { methods: NewToolMethod[] }>
      openApiLookup: Record<string, OpenAPIV3.OperationObject & { method: string; path: string }>
      zip: Record<string, { openApi: OpenAPIV3.OperationObject & { method: string; path: string }; mcp: NewToolMethod }>
    } {
      const apiName = 'API'
    
      const openApiLookup: Record<string, OpenAPIV3.OperationObject & { method: string; path: string }> = {}
      const tools: Record<string, { methods: NewToolMethod[] }> = {
        [apiName]: { methods: [] },
      }
      const zip: Record<string, { openApi: OpenAPIV3.OperationObject & { method: string; path: string }; mcp: NewToolMethod }> = {}
      for (const [path, pathItem] of Object.entries(this.openApiSpec.paths || {})) {
        if (!pathItem) continue
    
        for (const [method, operation] of Object.entries(pathItem)) {
          if (!this.isOperation(method, operation)) continue
    
          const mcpMethod = this.convertOperationToMCPMethod(operation, method, path)
          if (mcpMethod) {
            const uniqueName = this.ensureUniqueName(mcpMethod.name)
            mcpMethod.name = uniqueName
            mcpMethod.description = this.getDescription(operation.summary || operation.description || '')
            tools[apiName]!.methods.push(mcpMethod)
            openApiLookup[apiName + '-' + uniqueName] = { ...operation, method, path }
            zip[apiName + '-' + uniqueName] = { openApi: { ...operation, method, path }, mcp: mcpMethod }
          }
        }
      }
    
      return { tools, openApiLookup, zip }
    }
  • Generates the input schema for each tool method (operationId like 'get-user') by combining path/query params and requestBody into a JSON schema.
    private convertOperationToMCPMethod(operation: OpenAPIV3.OperationObject, method: string, path: string): NewToolMethod | null {
      if (!operation.operationId) {
        console.warn(`Operation without operationId at ${method} ${path}`)
        return null
      }
    
      const methodName = operation.operationId
    
      const inputSchema: IJsonSchema & { type: 'object' } = {
        $defs: this.convertComponentsToJsonSchema(),
        type: 'object',
        properties: {},
        required: [],
      }
    
      // Handle parameters (path, query, header, cookie)
      if (operation.parameters) {
        for (const param of operation.parameters) {
          const paramObj = this.resolveParameter(param)
          if (paramObj && paramObj.schema) {
            const schema = this.convertOpenApiSchemaToJsonSchema(paramObj.schema, new Set(), false)
            // Merge parameter-level description if available
            if (paramObj.description) {
              schema.description = paramObj.description
            }
            inputSchema.properties![paramObj.name] = schema
            if (paramObj.required) {
              inputSchema.required!.push(paramObj.name)
            }
          }
        }
      }
    
      // Handle requestBody
      if (operation.requestBody) {
        const bodyObj = this.resolveRequestBody(operation.requestBody)
        if (bodyObj?.content) {
          // Handle multipart/form-data for file uploads
          // We convert the multipart/form-data schema to a JSON schema and we require
          // that the user passes in a string for each file that points to the local file
          if (bodyObj.content['multipart/form-data']?.schema) {
            const formSchema = this.convertOpenApiSchemaToJsonSchema(bodyObj.content['multipart/form-data'].schema, new Set(), false)
            if (formSchema.type === 'object' && formSchema.properties) {
              for (const [name, propSchema] of Object.entries(formSchema.properties)) {
                inputSchema.properties![name] = propSchema
              }
              if (formSchema.required) {
                inputSchema.required!.push(...formSchema.required!)
              }
            }
          }
          // Handle application/json
          else if (bodyObj.content['application/json']?.schema) {
            const bodySchema = this.convertOpenApiSchemaToJsonSchema(bodyObj.content['application/json'].schema, new Set(), false)
            // Merge body schema into the inputSchema's properties
            if (bodySchema.type === 'object' && bodySchema.properties) {
              for (const [name, propSchema] of Object.entries(bodySchema.properties)) {
                inputSchema.properties![name] = propSchema
              }
              if (bodySchema.required) {
                inputSchema.required!.push(...bodySchema.required!)
              }
            } else {
              // If the request body is not an object, just put it under "body"
              inputSchema.properties!['body'] = bodySchema
              inputSchema.required!.push('body')
            }
          }
        }
      }
    
      // Build description including error responses
      let description = operation.summary || operation.description || ''
      if (operation.responses) {
        const errorResponses = Object.entries(operation.responses)
          .filter(([code]) => code.startsWith('4') || code.startsWith('5'))
          .map(([code, response]) => {
            const responseObj = this.resolveResponse(response)
            let errorDesc = responseObj?.description || ''
            return `${code}: ${errorDesc}`
          })
    
        if (errorResponses.length > 0) {
          description += '\nError Responses:\n' + errorResponses.join('\n')
        }
      }
    
      // Extract return type (response schema)
      const returnSchema = this.extractResponseType(operation.responses)
    
      // Generate Zod schema from input schema
      try {
        // const zodSchemaStr = jsonSchemaToZod(inputSchema, { module: "cjs" })
        // console.log(zodSchemaStr)
        // // Execute the function with the zod instance
        // const zodSchema = eval(zodSchemaStr) as z.ZodType
    
        return {
          name: methodName,
          description,
          inputSchema,
          ...(returnSchema ? { returnSchema } : {}),
        }
      } catch (error) {
        console.warn(`Failed to generate Zod schema for ${methodName}:`, error)
        // Fallback to a basic object schema
        return {
          name: methodName,
          description,
          inputSchema,
          ...(returnSchema ? { returnSchema } : {}),
        }
      }
    }
  • Initializes the converter to generate tools/schemas and lookup for operation resolution (maps 'API-get-user' to the corresponding OpenAPI operation).
      const converter = new OpenAPIToMCPConverter(openApiSpec)
      const { tools, openApiLookup } = converter.convertToMCPTools()
      this.tools = tools
      this.openApiLookup = openApiLookup
    
      this.setupHandlers()
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. 'Retrieve' implies a read operation, but the description doesn't specify authentication requirements, rate limits, error conditions, or what data is returned. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant behavioral gaps unaddressed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at just three words. It's front-loaded with the platform name, followed by the action and resource. There's zero wasted language, though this conciseness comes at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's purpose (retrieving user data), the absence of annotations, 0% schema coverage, and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It doesn't explain what user data is returned, how to obtain user IDs, authentication requirements, or how this differs from sibling tools. For a retrieval operation in a platform like Notion, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, so the single parameter 'user_id' is completely undocumented in the schema. The description provides no information about this parameter - what format it should be in, where to find user IDs, or what constitutes a valid user_id. The description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve') and resource ('a user'), and specifies the platform ('Notion'). However, it doesn't distinguish this tool from its sibling 'API-get-users', which appears to retrieve multiple users. The description is specific but lacks sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With siblings like 'API-get-users' (plural) and 'API-get-self' (likely for current user), there's no indication of when this single-user retrieval is appropriate versus those other options. No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gendosu/notion-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server