Skip to main content
Glama
gemmeinhq

Gemmein MCP Server

Official
by gemmeinhq
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gemmein MCP Server

  • Convex MCP server by get-convex

    Convex MCP serverofficial

    get-convex
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Convex’s MCP server lets you introspect tables, call functions, and read/write data seamlessly. Agents can generate one-off queries safely—thanks to Convex’s sandboxed queries, ensuring data integrity. Perfect for AI automation, real-time apps, and dynamic data access.
    12,615
    -
  • Appwrite MCP Server by appwrite

    Appwrite MCP Serverofficial

    appwrite
    A
    license
    C
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants to interact with Appwrite's API, providing tools to manage databases, users, functions, teams, and other resources within Appwrite projects.
    49
    73
    MIT
  • Firebase MCP Server by firebase

    Firebase MCP Serverofficial

    firebase
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables interaction with Firebase projects and services, including deployment, database management, authentication, and local emulation, through natural language.
    3,502,759 npm
    4,473
    MIT

  • Supabase

    mcp-dir
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables natural-language management of your cloud database backend, including running SQL, applying migrations, managing tables, storage, edge functions, and branches, plus searching documentation. Connects via one-click magic-link without keys or tokens.
    MIT

Related Servers

  • DODO MCP

    arthittakun
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A local-first MCP server that enables AI-assisted coding through workspace-scoped tools for file reading/editing, command execution, jobs, Git, LSP, media, browser, and desktop workflows. It enforces OAuth, workspace ACL, trust policies, and file/secret guards so owners can safely grant inspect, edit, or trusted capabilities.
    228 npm
    MIT

  • Coral Query Plane

    clauxel
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Paid remote MCP endpoint for AI SDK data queries, offering structured JSON tools, token-based access, usage receipts, and audit-ready workflow evidence.
    -

  • datavessel

    djr4
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Hosted MCP server that gives AI agents read and write access to your full marketing & ecommerce stack — Google Analytics, Search Console, Google & Meta Ads, Shopify, WooCommerce, Shopware, Slack and LinkedIn. 100+ tools across 10 connectors. BYOK, OAuth 2.1.
    -

  • Heavenly Health Protocol

    xbirimensah
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI clients to securely access, query, and mutate normalized user-controlled health data (e.g., from Apple Health or Supabase) through a bounded set of MCP tools, with optional OAuth and sandboxed deployment.
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, and descriptions explicitly route usage (e.g., guide vs reference vs search_docs; reaffirm_template vs check_integration). However, guide/reference/search_docs all provide documentation access, so some overlap remains that could cause hesitation.

Naming Consistency4/5

Seven tools follow verb_noun snake_case (search_docs, explain_rule, validate_collection_name, etc.), but guide and reference are bare nouns. All names are in snake_case and readable, making this a minor deviation.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools is well within the 3-15 sweet spot and each maps to a distinct stage of app-building guidance, validation, or checking. No tool feels redundant or missing in count.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers fit assessment, SDK reference, rule/error explanations, name validation, relay semantics, CI harness setup, and live integration checks. No obvious lifecycle or documentation gap exists for the stated guidance/validation purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources