Skip to main content
Glama
gcorroto

mcp-mantis

by gcorroto
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-mantis

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MantisBT MCP Server

      dpesch
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Integrates MantisBT bug tracker into Claude and other MCP clients via the REST API. Read and manage issues, notes, file attachments, tags, relationships, and monitors — with optional offline semantic search across all issues.
      34
      146 npm
      8
      MIT

    • mantis-mcp

      f-liva
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with MantisBT issues and notes via CRUD operations and semantic search.
      50 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Redmine MCP Server

      tamu960925
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Redmine instances to manage issues, projects, and users. It provides comprehensive tools for issue tracking, project oversight, and user management through the Redmine REST API.
      13 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Even similar tools like `get_issue` vs `get_issues` and `update_issue` vs `resolve_issue` have well-defined differences explained in descriptions, so an agent can reliably choose the correct one.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools start with 'mantis_' and follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., mantis_add_note, mantis_list_issues). The only slight deviation is mantis_whoami, but that's a common convention. Overall, naming is highly consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    20 tools cover a wide range of operations for a bug tracker: reading, updating, searching, relationships, attachments, enumerations, etc. The count is appropriate for the domain without being overwhelming.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks fundamental CRUD operations. There is no create_issue or delete_issue, and no tools to create/update/delete projects or filters. This creates significant gaps that will cause agent failures when these operations are needed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources