Skip to main content
Glama
gawirable

office-mcp

by gawirable
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to office-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TianshangScribe

      Tianshang301
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Office documents — create, edit, fill templates, convert, and extract Word/Excel/PowerPoint. LaTeX-style markup, math formulas, PDF export, template loops, and document diff. stdio / SSE / Streamable HTTP with auth and rate limiting.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-office-parser

      as7722314
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading, writing, editing, and converting Office documents (ODT, DOCX, ODS, XLSX, PDF, etc.) using MCP tools, with no external dependencies.
      11
      32 npm
      MIT

    • docx-mcp-server

      knorq-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for reading and editing Word (.docx) documents with 33 tools for content, formatting, comments, page layout, and track changes, running locally via stdio.
      27
      304 npm
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 47 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Tools are clearly separated by format prefix (word_, excel_, pptx_) and generic tools have distinct names. Each tool targets a specific operation, and there is no ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with format prefixes (e.g., word_add_paragraph, excel_read_sheet). Generic tools like convert_document and list_documents also adhere to this pattern. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 47 tools, the server covers three complex formats thoroughly. While high, it is justified by the need for separate create, read, update, delete, format, and export operations per format. Could be slightly trimmed but still reasonable.

    Completeness4/5

    Basic CRUD operations are present for all formats, plus exports and formatting. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking explicit delete for Word paragraphs/tables or Excel cells, but workarounds are available. Overall well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources