Literature Review Assistant
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| arxiv_searchB | Search for papers on arXiv. |
| dblp_searchB | Search DBLP database for computer science papers. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| latest_info | Generate a well-structured and readable summary of the most recent innovations, trends, and papers in a given research field. |
| related_topics | Discover related and emerging research areas connected to a given topic. |
| author_spotlight | Identify leading authors, labs, and research groups advancing innovation in the field. |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches arXiv for papers, while the other searches DBLP for computer science papers. There is no overlap in their target databases or functionality, making them easily distinguishable.
Both tools follow a consistent naming pattern with a database prefix followed by '_search' (arxiv_search, dblp_search). This verb_noun structure is uniform and predictable across the set.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a 'Literature Review Assistant' scope. It lacks essential operations like retrieving paper details, managing references, or accessing other databases, limiting its utility for comprehensive reviews.
The tool set is severely incomplete for literature review tasks. It only provides search functionality for two databases, missing critical operations such as fetching full-text, citation analysis, or integration with reference managers, which are core to the domain.