Skip to main content
Glama
gauravamar-blip

Tranna MCP

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
NODE_ENVNoDevelopment, test, or productionproduction
LOG_LEVELNoDebug, info, warn, or errorinfo
HEALTH_HOSTNoInterface for health checks0.0.0.0
HEALTH_PORTNoHealth HTTP port for native execution3000
HEALTH_ENABLEDNoEnables the health HTTP servertrue
SERVICE_VERSIONNoVersion returned in server status0.1.0
HOST_HEALTH_PORTNoHost port mapped by Docker Compose3000
META_CONNECTOR_ENABLEDNoEnables the real Meta connector after all required META_* values are suppliedfalse
EXAMPLE_CONNECTOR_ENABLEDNoEnables the fake demonstration connector and its fake-data MCP toolfalse
META_ALLOW_WRITE_OPERATIONSNoAllows publishing, campaign creation, campaign state changes, and budget updatesfalse

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
tranna_get_service_statusA

Returns the server's runtime readiness, authentication placeholder status, and registered connector statuses. No platform data is accessed.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly stated as a status check.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'tranna_get_service_status' follows a clear verb_noun pattern in snake_case, making it descriptive and internally consistent, though there are no other tools to compare.

Tool Count1/5

A single status-check tool is far too few to constitute a substantive MCP server, feeling like a placeholder or stub rather than a useful collection.

Completeness1/5

The tool only returns status information and explicitly accesses no platform data, leaving no operations for actual work, which is severely incomplete for any practical use.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues