Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
# Airlock

[![CI](https://github.com/gatewaybuddy/agentpier/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/gatewaybuddy/agentpier/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](LICENSE)
[![Python](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10%20|%203.11%20|%203.12-blue.svg)](pyproject.toml)
[![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/agentpier-airlock.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/agentpier-airlock/)

**Redaction engine + MCP server for AI agent traces. By AgentPier.**

Airlock is the missing seam between your secret scanner and your PII redactor.
It catches the identifiers that neither tool covers alone: AWS account IDs,
ARNs, private and public IPs, hostnames, emails, access keys, bearer tokens,
and high-entropy secrets — all in one pass, all replaced with typed placeholders
so the lesson survives and the identifier doesn't.

Built to protect war stories: battle-tested lessons from real agent sessions,
published without the infra details that would make them a reconnaissance target.

---

## Quickstart

```bash
pip install agentpier-airlock
python -c "from airlock.scrubber import scrub; print(scrub('account 123456789012 at 10.0.0.5'))"
# → account <ACCOUNT_ID> at <PRIVATE_IP>
```

Or run the demo:

```bash
git clone https://github.com/gatewaybuddy/agentpier.git
cd agentpier
python examples/demo.py
```

---

## Demo output

```
========================================================================
  AIRLOCK — Redaction Demo
========================================================================

--- BEFORE (raw agent trace) -------------------------------------------
[2026-06-24T14:32:01Z] AgentRun#7f3a2c1e — inventory task started
  Caller identity: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:user/deploy-agent
  Account: 123456789012  Region: us-east-1

  Probing EC2 in us-east-1...
  → Instance i-0abc1234def56789 at 203.0.113.42 (public), 10.0.1.55 (private)
  → Security group sg-0123456789abcdef0 allows 0.0.0.0/0:443

  S3 buckets found:
    s3://example-prod-data/logs/2026-06/
    s3://example-backups/snapshots/
  Cross-account replication target: --bucket-name example-dr-replica

  Secrets Manager: arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:123456789012:secret:prod/db-creds-xK8mP2
  Retrieved value: {"password": "s3cr3tP@ssw0rd!", "host": "db.internal.example.net"}

  Lambda env vars on arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:123456789012:function:data-processor:
    AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE
    AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

  Notification endpoint: ops-alerts@example.com
  On-call SMS: 407-555-0192
  Internal dashboard: https://monitoring.internal.example.net/dashboard

[2026-06-24T14:32:04Z] Inventory complete — 2 instances, 3 buckets, 1 function

--- AFTER (scrubbed) ---------------------------------------------------
[2026-06-24T14:32:01Z] AgentRun#7f3a2c1e — inventory task started
  Caller identity: <ARN>
  Account: <ACCOUNT_ID>  Region: us-east-1

  Probing EC2 in us-east-1...
  → Instance i-0abc1234def56789 at <PUBLIC_IP> (public), <PRIVATE_IP> (private)
  → Security group sg-0123456789abcdef0 allows <PUBLIC_IP>/0:443

  S3 buckets found:
    <BUCKET><PATH>
    <BUCKET><PATH>
  Cross-account replication target: --<BUCKET>

  Secrets Manager: <ARN>
  Retrieved value: {"password": "s3cr3tP@ssw0rd!", "host": "<FQDN>"}

  Lambda env vars on <ARN>
    AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=<ACCESS_KEY>
    AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=<SECRET>

  Notification endpoint: <EMAIL>
  On-call SMS: <PHONE>
  Internal dashboard: https://<FQDN>/dashboard

[2026-06-24T14:32:04Z] Inventory complete — 2 instances, 3 buckets, 1 function

--- GATE RESULT --------------------------------------------------------
  clean: False   status: DIRTY — quarantined
  findings: 22

========================================================================
  22 sensitive tokens redacted.  The lesson survives; the identifiers don't.
========================================================================
```

---

## What it catches

| Category | Examples | Placeholder |
|---|---|---|
| AWS access keys | `AKIA...` | `<ACCESS_KEY>` |
| Private key blocks | `-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----` | `<SECRET>` |
| Bearer tokens / passwords | `Authorization: Bearer ...` | `<SECRET>` |
| AWS account IDs | 12-digit numeric IDs | `<ACCOUNT_ID>` |
| ARNs | `arn:aws:...` | `<ARN>` |
| S3 bucket names (in URIs) | `s3://my-bucket/` | `<BUCKET>` |
| Private IPs | RFC 1918 (10.x, 172.16–31.x, 192.168.x) | `<PRIVATE_IP>` |
| Public IPs | Routable IPv4 | `<PUBLIC_IP>` |
| Hostnames / FQDNs | `api.example.com` | `<FQDN>` |
| Email addresses | `user@example.com` | `<EMAIL>` |
| US phone numbers | `407-555-0192` | `<PHONE>` |
| Absolute paths | `/home/user/.ssh/id_rsa` | `<PATH>` |
| High-entropy strings | Tokens, UUIDs-as-secrets (Shannon > 4.0 bits/char) | flagged by gate |
| **Your infra names** | Bucket/host names you configure | `<BUCKET>` |

---

## Usage

### Scrub a string

```python
from airlock.scrubber import scrub, gate

text = "Deployed to account 123456789012, endpoint api.example.com"

# scrub() — always redacts, returns clean string
print(scrub(text))
# → "Deployed to account <ACCOUNT_ID>, endpoint <FQDN>"

# gate() — DEFAULT-DENY: returns clean=False on ANY finding
result = gate(text)
print(result["clean"])    # False
print(result["findings"]) # [{rule: "AWS_ACCOUNT_ID", ...}, ...]
```

### Add your org's infra names to the denylist

```python
from airlock.scrubber import add_to_denylist
add_to_denylist(["my-prod-bucket", "internal.corp.net"])
```

Or via environment variable (for MCP server deployments):

```bash
export AIRLOCK_BUCKET_DENYLIST="my-prod-bucket,internal.corp.net,staging-data"
airlock-mcp
```

### Start the MCP server

```bash
# As a console script (after pip install):
AIRLOCK_BUCKET_DENYLIST="my-bucket" airlock-mcp

# Or directly from the repo:
PYTHONPATH=. python airlock/server.py
```

See `airlock/SKILL.md` for Claude Code / Cursor install config.

---

## Safety design

**DEFAULT-DENY gate**: `gate()` returns `clean=False` if *anything* sensitive
is found. There is no partial-clean state. A story either passes the gate
completely or it is quarantined.

**Double-gating**:
1. Gate on ingest — story is rejected if dirty; not stored
2. Scrub on egress — every return path runs `scrub()` (defense-in-depth)

**Denylist is empty by default**: Airlock ships with zero hardcoded infra names.
You bring your own via `AIRLOCK_BUCKET_DENYLIST` or `add_to_denylist()`. This
keeps the library from embedding any org's topology.

---

## MCP tools

| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| `submit_story` | Submit a war story. Gate-on-ingest: rejected with findings if dirty. |
| `search_stories` | Keyword + tag search. All results scrubbed on egress. |
| `get_story` | Fetch story by UUID. Scrubbed on egress. |

See `airlock/SKILL.md` for the full install guide and MCP config snippet.

---

## Schema

Stories follow the AgentErrorTaxonomy. Required fields: `id`, `title`,
`situation`, `goal`, `what_i_tried`, `what_failed`, `what_worked`, `lesson`,
`tags`, `narrator_id`, `timestamp`, `trust`. At least one taxonomy tag is
required: `memory | reflection | planning | action | system`.

See `airlock/STORY_TEMPLATE.md` for the fill-in-the-blanks template.

---

## Running tests

```bash
# From the repo root
PYTHONPATH=. python -m pytest airlock/tests/ -v
```

The test suite includes unit tests for the scrubber (41 tests), handler tests
(18 tests), and end-to-end subprocess smoke tests speaking real JSON-RPC 2.0
wire protocol (10 tests). All fixtures use RFC-reserved / AWS-documented
identifiers — no real infrastructure values.

---

## License

Apache 2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).

## Contributing

See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md).

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_story fetches by UUID, search_stories searches by keyword/tag, and submit_story creates a new story. No functional overlap exists.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: get_story, search_stories, submit_story. No deviations or mixed conventions.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools form a minimal but complete set for the server's purpose: submitting, fetching individually, and searching. The count is well-scoped for a focused narrative storage system.

Completeness4/5

Covers create, read, and search operations. Missing update and delete, which may be intentional given security constraints (scrubbed on egress). Minor gap that agents can work around.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues