Skip to main content
Glama
Bitbucket Server MCP

Bitbucket Server MCP

by garc33

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bitbucket Server MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Bitbucket Server (Data Center) via MCP, supporting reading pull requests and diffs, drafting and submitting reviews with verdicts, posting tasks, browsing code and commits, and managing pull requests.
      1
      ISC
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.
      27
      768 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with a Bitbucket Server/Data Center instance, exposing its REST v1.0 API as MCP tools to manage projects, repositories, branches, pull requests, comments, diffs, commits, files, search, and build status.
      41
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.
      19
      11,347 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions clearly separate near-neighbors like add_comment vs add_comment_inline and get_activities vs get_comments/get_reviews. The timeline tools still overlap somewhat since get_activities returns comments and reviews as well, but the distinctions are understandable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow snake_case verb_noun naming (create_pull_request, get_diff, delete_branch, etc.). Minor deviations like the bare 'search' and 'browse_repository' versus 'list_repositories' are noticeable but do not undermine readability.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 28 tools this is heavy for a single MCP server, even one covering Bitbucket. Many operations are genuinely useful, but some could be consolidated or made more narrowly scoped, making the surface feel borderline oversized.

    Completeness4/5

    The PR lifecycle, commenting, reviews, repo browsing, search, branches, commits, builds, and Code Insights are well covered. Gaps remain around branch creation and broader repository/project administration, but core agent workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing