Bitbucket Server MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Bitbucket Server MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Bitbucket Server (Data Center) via MCP, supporting reading pull requests and diffs, drafting and submitting reviews with verdicts, posting tasks, browsing code and commits, and managing pull requests.1ISC
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.27768 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with a Bitbucket Server/Data Center instance, exposing its REST v1.0 API as MCP tools to manage projects, repositories, branches, pull requests, comments, diffs, commits, files, search, and build status.41-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.1911,347 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with Bitbucket Cloud REST API 2.0, supporting pull requests, pipelines, logs, and repository cloning through MCP tools.30 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interaction with Bitbucket repositories through the Model Context Protocol, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Server with features for PR lifecycle management and code review.2011,347 npm30MIT
TDQS
Scored across 28 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions clearly separate near-neighbors like add_comment vs add_comment_inline and get_activities vs get_comments/get_reviews. The timeline tools still overlap somewhat since get_activities returns comments and reviews as well, but the distinctions are understandable.
Almost all tools follow snake_case verb_noun naming (create_pull_request, get_diff, delete_branch, etc.). Minor deviations like the bare 'search' and 'browse_repository' versus 'list_repositories' are noticeable but do not undermine readability.
At 28 tools this is heavy for a single MCP server, even one covering Bitbucket. Many operations are genuinely useful, but some could be consolidated or made more narrowly scoped, making the surface feel borderline oversized.
The PR lifecycle, commenting, reviews, repo browsing, search, branches, commits, builds, and Code Insights are well covered. Gaps remain around branch creation and broader repository/project administration, but core agent workflows have no dead ends.