obsidian_plugin_disable
Disable an Obsidian plugin by specifying its ID. Use this to turn off plugins when troubleshooting or managing your setup.
Instructions
Disable a plugin
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Plugin ID |
Disable an Obsidian plugin by specifying its ID. Use this to turn off plugins when troubleshooting or managing your setup.
Disable a plugin
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Plugin ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral details such as what happens if the plugin is already disabled, required permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no waste, highly front-loaded and efficient for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is adequate but could be improved by stating success/failure behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with parameter 'id' described as 'Plugin ID'. The description adds no further meaning, meeting the baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Disable a plugin' clearly states the action and resource. It effectively communicates the tool's function, but lacks differentiation from siblings like obsidian_plugin_enable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like obsidian_plugin_enable or obsidian_plugin_reload. No context about prerequisites or use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gapmiss/live-mcp-for-obsidian'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server