列出 CookLikeHOC 分类

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description provides the key behavioral context that the tool operates on a local checkout, and that it returns categories with counts. It conveys a read-only listing operation, though it does not detail error behavior or output formatting.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the action and states the scope and result. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description adequately covers the tool's purpose and output for a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool. It specifies the local context and the information returned (categories and counts), making it complete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so the schema is trivially complete. The description adds no parameter-level details because none exist. The baseline score of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: listing recipe categories and counts from a local CookLikeHOC checkout. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like search_recipes and get_recipe, which focus on searching and fetching individual recipes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives. It implies that for category overviews you would use this tool, but no explicit usage conditions or exclusion criteria are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.