Skip to main content
Glama
gaokai258

Fee Optimizer MCP

by gaokai258

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fee Optimizer MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fetch real-time exchange trading fees, compare rebate-adjusted costs, obtain referral links, calculate trading costs, and identify compliant exchanges for crypto trading.
      6
      84 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to compare AI model pricing plans, run cost scenarios, find break-even points, and get plan recommendations using TokenLens data.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides live cryptocurrency market data from over 100 exchanges, enabling AI agents to fetch prices, order books, funding rates, and more for trading analysis and arbitrage opportunities.
      13
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables real-time crypto market data, funding rates, cross-exchange arbitrage, portfolio analytics, exchange skills, and trading via your own connected exchange keys through natural language agent workflows.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to fetch live, dated prices for LLM models and cloud compute instances across providers, compare and recommend models, and estimate monthly costs based on workload-specific token shapes and constraints.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is a large cluster of heavily overlapping 'compute a cross-venue cost' tools—compare_exchange_fees, compare_total_cost, calculate_annual_cost, calculate_savings, recommend_exchange, analyze_persona, compare_personas, compare_countries, and volume_what_if all return ranked fee comparisons with only subtly different lenses. The descriptions do cross-reference each other (e.g. 'for the all-in cost of a trade use compare_total_cost instead'), which helps, but an agent asked a generic 'which exchange is cheapest' question faces genuine selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (calculate_savings, compare_total_cost, get_funding_rates, analyze_persona, recommend_exchange). The only outlier is volume_what_if, which drops the verb prefix, but the set is otherwise predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 19 tools the surface is on the heavy side for a fee-optimization server, and several tools appear consolidatable (e.g. compare_exchange_fees / compare_total_cost / calculate_annual_cost are variants of the same comparison). The breadth of the domain (multi-exchange, multi-cost-leg, personas, countries) justifies many of them, but 19 is borderline.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage of the fee-optimization domain is exceptionally thorough: trading fees, funding rates, execution/spread, withdrawal fees, fiat on/off-ramps, token discounts, consumer-interface markups, stablecoin regional access, API-verified account tiers, referral links, data provenance, plus persona/country and what-if analysis. No obvious operational gaps or dead ends for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues