benzersiz_haberler

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states the output is a unique news list with duplicates cleaned. It does not specify whether the tool is read-only, how duplicates are determined, or any side effects. The mention of threshold parameter adds minimal context but not enough for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single short sentence, which is concise and directly states the purpose. It is front-loaded with the key action. However, it could be slightly more descriptive without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too brief. It lacks information about return format, edge cases (e.g., empty input, extreme threshold values), and any behavioral notes. For a simple tool with two parameters, it is minimally complete but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema; it does not explain the purpose of threshold or limit in more detail. The description is self-contained but provides no added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool returns a unique news list with duplicates removed. The verb 'döndürür' (returns) and resource 'benzersiz haber listesi' (unique news list) are specific. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like haber_cek (fetch) and kopyalari_bul (find copies).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., kopyalari_bul for finding duplicates, or haber_cek for fetching raw news). No context about prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.