PTC-MCP
PTC-MCP lets you run Python scripts that call MCP tools as async functions, returning only stdout to the conversation.
Execute Python programs via
execute_program, with MCP tools injected asmcp__<server>__<tool>()async functions.Batch multiple tool calls in loops, conditionals, and aggregations, keeping intermediate results out of context.
Discover callable tools with
list_callable_tools()and inspect schemas withinspect_tool(tool_name=...)inside scripts.Use
emit()for structured results,ToolErrorfor failure handling, andserver_status()for connection states.Operate under configurable limits: timeouts, output size, tool-call budgets, concurrency, and sandboxing.
Provides a Python execution environment that allows for the programmatic orchestration of multiple MCP tools within a single script, enabling batch processing and complex logic without multiple model round-trips.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@PTC-MCPBatch compare the quarterly revenue trends for AMZN, MSFT, and GOOG."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Programmatic Tool Call MCP
Programmatic Tool Calling for Claude Code via MCP.
Claude Code on subscription plans lacks the Anthropic API's programmatic tool calling (PTC) feature, where Claude can write Python scripts that call multiple tools in a single execution. Without it, every tool invocation is a full model round-trip — intermediate results enter the context window, consuming tokens and adding latency.
PTC-MCP fixes this. It's an MCP server that exposes three tools:
list_callable_tools— Returns a JSON list of all available tool names. Use this to discover what's callable before writing a script.inspect_tool— Returns the schema and description of a specific tool, including itsoutputSchemaif the upstream server defines one.execute_program— Runs a Python script with MCP tools injected as async functions. Only stdout comes back. Intermediate tool results stay in the Python runtime and never enter the conversation.
How it works
flowchart TD
A[Claude Code] -->|list_callable_tools| B[PTC-MCP Server]
A -->|inspect_tool| B
A -->|execute_program| B
B --> C[Tool Registry]
B --> D[Execution Engine]
C -->|Connects at startup,<br/>applies allow/block filters| E[Downstream MCP Servers]
D -->|Runs script with tools<br/>as async functions| C
D -->|stdout only| AAt startup, PTC-MCP connects to your configured MCP servers as a client, discovers their tools, and makes them callable as mcp__<server>__<tool>() async functions inside scripts. Claude can call list_callable_tools to discover available tools, inspect_tool to understand a tool's schema, and then execute_program to run a script using those tools. Tool calls proxy to the real MCP servers, results stay local, and only print() output goes back.
Related MCP server: code2mcp
Tools
list_callable_tools
Takes no arguments. Returns a JSON array of sorted namespaced tool names:
["mcp__financial_data__query_financials", "mcp__internal_apis__get_resource"]inspect_tool
Takes a tool_name string. Returns the tool's schema, description, and outputSchema (if available):
{
"name": "mcp__financial_data__query_financials",
"description": "Query financial statements for a given ticker.",
"inputSchema": { "type": "object", "properties": { "ticker": { "type": "string" } }, "required": ["ticker"] },
"outputSchema": null,
"note": "No output schema defined by the upstream server. Inspect the return value in your script."
}Note:
outputSchemais populated when the downstream MCP server defines one on its tools per the MCP tool output schema specification. Downstream servers that declare output schemas improve discoverability — Claude can understand return types before writing a script. Without one,inspect_toolreturnsnullforoutputSchemaand suggests inspecting return values at runtime instead.
execute_program
Takes a code string. Runs the Python script in a sandboxed child process with all registered tools available as async functions. Returns stdout prefixed with a status line (plus any emit() result and a tool-call summary), and structured content with ok, output, result, error, and tool_calls. Failed runs set MCP isError.
Example
Claude decides comparing three tickers benefits from batched execution:
execute_program(code="""
tickers = ["AMZN", "MSFT", "GOOG"]
for t in tickers:
data = await mcp__financial_data__query_financials(
ticker=t, statement="income", period="quarter", limit=4
)
revenues = [q["revenue"] for q in data]
trend = " → ".join(f"${r/1e9:.1f}B" for r in revenues)
print(f"{t}: {trend}")
""")Three tool calls happen inside the script. Claude sees only:
[Script executed successfully]
AMZN: $170.0B → $165.3B → $158.9B → $149.2B
MSFT: $65.6B → $62.0B → $59.1B → $56.5B
GOOG: $96.5B → $88.3B → $85.0B → $80.5BSetup
Requires Python 3.11+.
uv venv && uv pip install -e ".[dev]"Configuration
Copy config.example.yaml to config.yaml (gitignored) and edit it, or set PTC_MCP_CONFIG to point elsewhere. Keep secrets out of the file with ${VAR} references:
servers:
- name: financial-data
transport: stdio
command: node
args: ["./financial-data-mcp/dist/index.js"]
env:
API_KEY: ${FINANCIAL_DATA_API_KEY} # from ptc-mcp's environment
- name: internal-apis
transport: http # streamable HTTP ("sse" also supported)
url: "https://internal.example.com/mcp"
headers:
Authorization: "Bearer ${INTERNAL_TOKEN}"
tools:
allow: # glob patterns; or use `block`
- "mcp__financial_data__*"
execution:
timeout_seconds: 120
max_output_bytes: 65536
sandbox: seatbelt # or "none"
max_tool_calls: 100 # per program (introspection helpers not counted)
max_concurrent_calls: 8
tool_call_timeout_seconds: 60
trace: summary # or "off"
max_tool_result_bytes: 16777216 # per tool result passed into a scriptservers — MCP servers to bridge:
stdio,http(streamable HTTP), orsse.command,args,env,url, andheadersexpand${VAR}and${VAR:-default}; an unset variable without a default is a config error.tools.allow / tools.block — namespaced tool names or glob patterns (mutually exclusive). Omit both to allow everything; prefer an allowlist.
execution — time/output limits, the sandbox mode (below), and the per-program tool-call budget.
Results, errors, and budgets
Inside a program:
Tool results are parsed JSON. When the server returns structured content it is used directly; any extra text the server sent (e.g. "EMPTY RESULT …" warnings) is kept under a
_noteskey instead of being lost or turning the result into a string.A tool that fails raises
ToolError; catch it to continue. That covers anis_errorresult, a protocol error, a timeout, an exhausted budget, a result that does not match the tool's declared output schema, a result larger thanmax_tool_result_bytes, and a lost connection. Only a lost connection triggers a reconnect; bad data from a healthy server never does.Non-text content (images, audio, embedded resources) cannot enter the sandbox; it is replaced by a
_notesplaceholder such as[non-text content omitted: image (image/png)]rather than dropped silently.emit(value)returns a JSON-serializable structured result (last call wins). It appears after--- result ---in the output and asresultin theexecute_programstructured content.Helpers:
list_callable_tools(),inspect_tool(tool_name=...), andserver_status()(connection state of each downstream server).
Each program may make at most max_tool_calls calls, max_concurrent_calls
at a time, each bounded by tool_call_timeout_seconds. With trace: summary
the output ends with a line such as [tool calls: 12, 1 failed; 2.3s] plus the
failures; the structured content always lists every call (tool, arguments, ok,
duration, error).
Known limitation: FastMCP-style servers wrap non-object returns as
{"result": value} and ptc unwraps that shape. A server that genuinely returns
an object whose only key is result, alongside prose text that is not its JSON
rendering, is indistinguishable and will be unwrapped too.
Each downstream server is supervised: if it fails to start or its connection
drops, ptc-mcp keeps reconnecting with backoff. Its tools disappear from
list_callable_tools (which then names the unavailable servers) and reappear
once it is back.
Sandbox
Scripts never run inside the server process. Each execute_program call starts a
fresh child interpreter and talks to it over stdin/stdout; only the server holds
the MCP sessions, so tools are the only way a script can reach data.
sandbox: seatbelt(default, macOS): the child runs undersandbox-execwith a deny-by-default profile — no network, no subprocesses orfork, no reads or writes outside a per-run scratch directory (its working directory, deleted afterwards), and no way to even check whether files exist elsewhere.sandbox: none: same child process, empty environment, and limits, but without the OS sandbox. Explicit opt-in (e.g. Linux CI). Ifseatbeltis configured but unavailable, scripts refuse to run rather than fall back.
In every mode the child:
gets an empty environment (API keys in the server's environment or in a server's
envconfig are never visible to scripts),runs the base interpreter with
-I -S: standard library only — the server's own packages are not importable,is killed at
timeout_seconds, including CPU-bound code (while True:), with CPU-time, file-size and open-file limits as a backstop,cannot corrupt the tool channel:
print,os.write(1, ...), and leftover background tasks all stay inside the child.
sandbox-exec is deprecated by Apple but still ships and enforces (Claude Code
and Codex CLI use it the same way). It is isolated in sandbox.py, so another
backend (Docker, Apple container) can replace it.
Failed runs — script errors, timeouts, sandbox failures — are returned with MCP
isError: true.
The server starts fine with no config file or an empty servers list.
Running
# Directly
uv run python -m ptc_mcp
# Or via the installed entry point
ptc-mcpThe server communicates over stdio (JSON-RPC). Add it to your Claude Code MCP settings to use it.
Testing
uv run pytest tests/ -vTests include unit tests for config parsing, the execution engine, registry filtering/namespacing, sandbox isolation (escape attempts, timeouts, channel integrity), result parsing, budgets, and end-to-end integration tests that spin up a real mock MCP server (including crash-and-reconnect). Built on MCP Python SDK 2.x; serves both 2025-era clients (e.g. Claude Code) and 2026-07-28 clients.
Available Tools
1 toolexecute_programA
Execute a Python program with access to MCP tools as async functions. Tool calls within the script are dispatched to their respective MCP servers. Only stdout (from print statements) is returned — intermediate tool results do not enter the conversation context. Use this when a task involves 3+ tool calls, loops, filtering, aggregation, or conditional logic based on intermediate results. For single tool calls, call the tool directly. All tool functions require await.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | Yes | Python code to execute. MCP tools are available as async functions using their namespaced names (e.g., mcp__financial_data__query_financials). Use `await` for all tool calls. Use `print()` to produce output. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure and does so effectively. It explains key behavioral traits: tool calls are dispatched to MCP servers, only stdout from print statements is returned (not intermediate results), and all tool functions require await. It doesn't cover potential limitations like execution timeouts or error handling, but provides substantial operational context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is efficiently structured with zero wasted sentences. It front-loads the core purpose, then explains behavioral constraints, followed by clear usage guidelines. Every sentence adds essential information about how the tool works and when to use it.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and a single parameter, the description provides comprehensive context about the tool's behavior, constraints, and appropriate usage. It explains the execution model, output limitations, and programming requirements. The main gap is lack of information about return format or error conditions, but overall it's quite complete for this complexity level.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the single 'code' parameter. The description adds some context about how MCP tools are accessed within the code (namespaced names) and the requirement to use print() for output, but doesn't provide significant additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema indicates.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with specific verbs ('execute a Python program') and resources ('with access to MCP tools as async functions'). It distinguishes this tool's unique capability of running multi-step scripts with tool integration from direct tool calls, even though there are no sibling tools to differentiate from.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit guidance on when to use this tool ('when a task involves 3+ tool calls, loops, filtering, aggregation, or conditional logic based on intermediate results') and when not to use it ('for single tool calls, call the tool directly'). It clearly defines the appropriate context and alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v0.1.0- First observed
execute_program
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool has a clearly defined singular purpose of executing Python programs with MCP integration.
The single tool follows a clear verb_noun naming pattern (execute_program). Since there are no other tools to compare against, consistency is inherently perfect.
One tool is too few for a server's apparent purpose of program execution with MCP integration, as it lacks complementary tools for tasks like listing available programs, managing execution environments, or handling errors. This feels thin and incomplete for the domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for the inferred domain of program execution and MCP tool orchestration. There are obvious gaps, such as no tools for program management, debugging, or result handling, which will limit agent capabilities and cause failures in complex workflows.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
One MCP endpoint for Claude, GPT & Gemini: 100+ tools + no-code connectors + agent workers.
Multiple MCP tools, persistent graph memory, token-saving data pointers, and more.
No-data MCP handoff for local Claude Code to Codex harness moves. $49 lifetime.
The Remote MCP server acts as a standardized bridge between LLM applications (like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor) and external services, enabling AI agents to access external tools and resources. Its primary capability is providing a centralized search tool to discover other MCP servers and their respective tools. Unlike local implementations, it runs remotely with OAuth authentication and permission controls for security.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceUniversal MCP server for executing TypeScript and Python code with progressive disclosure, reducing token usage by 98% by enabling on-demand access to all other MCP tools through code execution rather than loading tool definitions directly.15 npm130MIT
- FlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables execution of TypeScript code to call MCP tools instead of direct tool calls, reducing token usage by up to 98% while orchestrating complex multi-tool workflows through secure sandboxed code execution.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to write and execute Python code in an isolated sandbox that can orchestrate multiple MCP tool calls, reducing context window bloat and improving efficiency for complex workflows.23-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables dynamic loading, hot-reloading, and orchestration of MCP servers without restarting Claude Code, allowing programmatic tool calling and workflow automation across multiple servers.2-