get_cookies
Retrieve all cookies or a specific cookie by name from the browser session.
Instructions
Get all cookies or one cookie by name.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No |
Retrieve all cookies or a specific cookie by name from the browser session.
Get all cookies or one cookie by name.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states action. No disclosure of behavioral traits like return format, error handling, or destructive effects. Minimal behavioral information.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 10 words, front-loaded with key information. No redundant or extraneous content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple retrieval tool with one parameter. However, lacks details on return behavior when cookie is not found or the format of the returned data. Given no output schema, description could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It explains that omitting name retrieves all cookies, while providing name retrieves one. This adds meaningful conditional behavior beyond the schema's property definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it retrieves all cookies or one by name. Verb 'get' and resource 'cookies' are specific. Siblings add/delete cookies are distinct, so purpose is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, but the context of cookie-related siblings (add_cookie, delete_cookie) implies usage. The conditional behavior based on the name parameter is implied but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gaforov/selenium-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server