classify

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, and the description does not disclose what the tool does, what inputs it expects, what outputs it returns, or any side effects or requirements. The mention of cost is the only behavioral trait, which is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but the brevity is due to under-specification rather than concise completeness. It lacks necessary content, so the structure does not earn a passing score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a complex AI classification tool with no annotations, no output schema, and a nearly empty parameter schema. The description fails to provide any practical information about classification categories, input format, or result structure, making it wholly incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema only has a generic 'params' object with no specific properties. The description adds nothing about what parameters to pass, leaving the agent completely uninformed about how to construct a valid request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description calls it a 'Content & AI tool' but doesn't specify what classification action it performs. This is barely more than a tautology of the name 'classify' and does not distinguish it from sibling AI tools like summarize or translate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus any alternative. The only extra detail is the cost, which is not usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.