Skip to main content
Glama
gaddobenedetti

MCP Email

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Email

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to read, send, and manage emails via POP3 and SMTP with TLS support.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with email accounts via IMAP and SMTP, supporting mailbox listing, email search, retrieval, sending, and management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents send email over SMTP and read, search, and manage email over IMAP or POP3 using app passwords or authorization codes, with attachment handling and support for common providers.
      7
      120 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, and manage emails via SMTP and IMAP, with support for attachments, threads, and mailbox organization.
      16
      17 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to send, receive, search, and manage emails via SMTP/IMAP, including support for attachments, contacts, and advanced search.
      18
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI to send, read, search, delete and reply to emails through SMTP or Gmail API, supporting common email services like QQ, 163, Gmail and Outlook with HTML/text formats and attachments.
      23 npm
      1
      ISC

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    pollEmails lists all inbox emails (subset, no body), while getEmailsById retrieves specific emails by ID. The distinction is mostly clear, though both return lists of email objects and the full-body retrieval behavior of getEmailsById is not explicit. Delete and send tools are clearly separate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use camelCase with a verb-first pattern (pollEmails, getEmailsById, deleteEmailsById, sendTextEmail, sendHtmlEmail). The retrieval verbs 'poll' and 'get' differ slightly, but overall naming is predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools provide a well-scoped minimal email client covering listing, ID-based retrieval, deletion, and two sending formats. Each tool has a clear purpose and the count is appropriate for the stated scope.

    Completeness3/5

    Core create/read/delete operations are present, but update operations (e.g., mark read/unread, flag, move) and search are missing. It is also unclear whether getEmailsById returns full email bodies, leaving a potential gap for reading message content.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues