ezd_api1_update_case_attributes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely says 'update attributes' without explaining whether the update replaces the whole attribute set, merges with existing attributes, or triggers side effects. Important operational details like idempotency and authorization requirements are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no fluff or repetition. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, though it sacrifices valuable behavioral detail for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With five parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the one-line description is insufficient. It does not explain the update semantics, return value, required permissions, or how this tool relates to sibling update tools. An agent would need more context to use this tool reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The schema already provides basic descriptions for parameters such as Atrybuty, IdKoszulki, and the optional owner IDs. The tool description itself adds no parameter meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('Zaktualizuj') and resource ('atrybuty koszulki sprawy') in the EZD PUW system, so an agent can infer the operation. However, it does not distinguish this tool from the similarly named sibling ezd_koszulka_update_attributes, which appears to target the same attributes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many related case/update tools. A nearly identical sibling, ezd_koszulka_update_attributes, exists, and the description gives no criteria for choosing between them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.