Skip to main content
Glama
gabyic

AgentDock MCP Harness

by gabyic

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentDock MCP Harness

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a ChatGPT Web conversation to act as a coding agent on a VPS, with project-bound chats, Git worktree isolation, live activity streaming, structured questions, and file/image exchange via MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives ChatGPT and Claude Code policy-scoped access to a local repository checkout, allowing them to list, search, read, edit, and create files, run operator-approved fixture tests, and inspect git diffs. It confines operations to configured paths and resources, and supports an independent read-only review workflow.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to securely control remote development servers over OAuth-protected MCP, exposing workspace-bounded tools for file editing, command execution, Git operations, and running Codex or GitHub Copilot subagents.
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Secure agent coding runtime for local Git repos with policy enforcement, RBAC, sessions, approval workflow, and sandboxed writes, optionally connectable to ChatGPT via Secure MCP Tunnel.
      8
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables ordinary ChatGPT web Chat to work directly on a local machine over a private MCP tunnel — reading and editing project files, running shell commands and tests, loading local skills, manipulating images, and driving Chrome — without spinning up a separate coding agent or additional model-generation API calls. It also supports multi-step task plans with persisted execution receipts and acceptance checks so results from real runs are returned to the conversation.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear prefixes for domains (skill, git, audit, approval, process, repo, task, workflow, file). Within each domain, verbs are specific (list, search, read, install, update, commit, get, respond, start, status, output, cancel, inspect, create, resume, finish, cleanup, guide, advance, patch, write, diff) with no overlapping purposes. The only mild overlap is between git.diff and repo.inspect, but their descriptions clarify that git.diff is Task-specific while repo.inspect is generic, so ambiguity is minimal.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 29 tools follow the consistent pattern <domain>.<action> with lowercase snake_case actions. The action verbs are uniform across domains (list, search, read, install, update, create, start, etc.), and there are no style mixing or irregular naming conventions. The pattern is predictable and easy to infer.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 29 tools, the count is on the heavier side, exceeding the typical 3-15 range and even the 25+ threshold that suggests over-scoping. However, the server covers a broad domain (skills, tasks, processes, workflows, files, git, audit, approvals), so each tool appears to serve a specific need. Still, it feels slightly bloated, and some tools could potentially be consolidated (e.g., task.resume and process.status overlap in restoring metadata), so a score of 3 is appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle for tasks (create, resume, finish, cancel, cleanup), processes (start, status, output, cancel), workflows (start, list, update, guide, advance), and files (read, search, patch, write). Git operations include commit, diff, and inspect. Skills have list, search, read, install, update. Approvals and audit are covered. Minor gaps include no task.list to enumerate tasks, no process.list to enumerate running processes, and no skill uninstall/delete, but these are non-critical and agents can work around them via existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues