No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 29 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear prefixes for domains (skill, git, audit, approval, process, repo, task, workflow, file). Within each domain, verbs are specific (list, search, read, install, update, commit, get, respond, start, status, output, cancel, inspect, create, resume, finish, cleanup, guide, advance, patch, write, diff) with no overlapping purposes. The only mild overlap is between git.diff and repo.inspect, but their descriptions clarify that git.diff is Task-specific while repo.inspect is generic, so ambiguity is minimal.
All 29 tools follow the consistent pattern <domain>.<action> with lowercase snake_case actions. The action verbs are uniform across domains (list, search, read, install, update, create, start, etc.), and there are no style mixing or irregular naming conventions. The pattern is predictable and easy to infer.
With 29 tools, the count is on the heavier side, exceeding the typical 3-15 range and even the 25+ threshold that suggests over-scoping. However, the server covers a broad domain (skills, tasks, processes, workflows, files, git, audit, approvals), so each tool appears to serve a specific need. Still, it feels slightly bloated, and some tools could potentially be consolidated (e.g., task.resume and process.status overlap in restoring metadata), so a score of 3 is appropriate.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle for tasks (create, resume, finish, cancel, cleanup), processes (start, status, output, cancel), workflows (start, list, update, guide, advance), and files (read, search, patch, write). Git operations include commit, diff, and inspect. Skills have list, search, read, install, update. Approvals and audit are covered. Minor gaps include no task.list to enumerate tasks, no process.list to enumerate running processes, and no skill uninstall/delete, but these are non-critical and agents can work around them via existing tools.