sifa-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| logging | {} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| extensions | {
"io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| create_worker_profileA | Create a portable worker reputation profile. Western parallel: LinkedIn profile creation, Angie's List contractor profile. This is the 'economic passport' that travels with the worker. DEMO — no real identity verification in this prototype. |
| add_service_recordA | Add a completed service record to a worker's profile. Western parallel: Uber trip completion, Angie's List job review, Upwork completed contract. Each record builds the reputation score. DEMO — client verification is simulated. |
| get_reputation_profileA | Retrieve a worker's full reputation profile including trust score. Western parallel: Checking a contractor's BBB rating or Upwork JSS. DEMO data. |
| generate_referenceA | Generate a structured professional reference letter for a worker. Western parallel: LinkedIn recommendation, employer reference letter. Outputs a formatted reference that can be printed, shared as PDF, or verified by QR code in production. DEMO. |
| list_skill_categoriesA | List all skill categories and subcategories available in the Sifa system. Use this to see valid skill values for create_worker_profile. |
| compare_workersA | Compare the reputation scores of multiple workers for a specific job. Western parallel: Contractor comparison on Thumbtack, Bark, or Houzz. DEMO data. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: creating profiles, adding service records, comparing workers, generating references, retrieving profiles, and listing skill categories. No two tools overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_worker_profile, get_reputation_profile, list_skill_categories). The naming is uniform and predictable.
With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a reputation management system. Each tool covers a core operation without unnecessary bloat or deficiency.
The tool set covers essential operations (CRUD on profiles, records, comparisons, references). Missing update/delete operations for profiles and records are minor gaps given the demo nature.