dual_citizenship_guide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states the tool is 'guidance' and includes 'DEMO', which may indicate limited functionality, but does not explain read/write behavior, side effects, or limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is very concise at 7 words, but the inclusion of 'DEMO' is ambiguous and not beneficial. Lacks structured format, but brevity is a positive.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite simplicity (1 optional param, output schema exists), description omits what the tool returns, how parameters affect output, and does not help the agent decide if this tool fits the user's need. Incomplete for a guidance tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% for the single parameter (current_citizenship). The description does not mention or explain this parameter, leaving its meaning and usage entirely unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool provides guidance on Kenya dual citizenship, covering eligibility, process, and rights. It distinguishes from sibling tools like diaspora_tax_guide by topic, but lacks a verb-action indicating what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like immigration_status_guide or diaspora_community_guide. User must infer from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.